• @InverseParallax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    217 days ago

    Yeah, but Alaska uses dramatically less energy than… like, everywhere. Given that there are no people and the only industries are either oil or resources.

    • KillingTimeItself
      link
      fedilink
      English
      017 days ago

      oil and resource industries are pretty well known for being energy intensive no?

      last i checked industry is the primary energy consumer. Sure there’s less people in alaska, but it was just an example i picked, and the market economics would still be applicable there. If it’s cheaper to buy hydrogen, than it is to produce locally sourced power, that’s going to be what happens.

      • @InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        217 days ago

        Not in comparison to… normal things like people and manufacturing.

        And oil is oil, it’s self-powering. Many/most are powered off of the propane out-gassing to dedicated turbines.