• @sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2923 hours ago

    There is a theory that sanctions against a country with a tyrannical ruler hurt the common people more than the oligarchs / dictator. But eventually they do make life more difficult for that ruler

        • @Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 hours ago

          So only 3-4 left to go :-)

          Jk

          But letting the dictator free reign is even worse, look at how many people putin has killed in the unnecessary agression of Ukraine. That’s not some slight “suffering”, that’s death and everything that comes with it for the families left behind.

        • @underwire212@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          146 hours ago

          TF you on? Just because there weren’t immediate, drastic regime level changes doesn’t mean they went “exactly nowhere”.

          There have been many changes at smaller levels not being reported in mainstream western media. Public pressure called for MANY local officials to step down along with changes in law that have already started effecting everyday life, and at least in Thailand, some pretty major changes in how public officials are held accountable via more expansive auditing channels, thereby increasing transparency.

          Not everything is a fucking hollywood movie wherein you have some Hunger Games style uprising against the elite.

          In fact, it’s fucking insulting hearing people who haven’t an ounce of global exposure beyond whatever 2 or 3 media sources they shove their heads into saying “those protesters got nothing accomplished”.

          Never let anyone tell you protesting doesn’t work.

    • @dontgooglefinderscult
      link
      English
      122 hours ago

      If that were true Cuba would be a US territory, Russia would’ve collapsed in the early 2000s, and myanmars would still be Burma.

      The only thing sanctions do is harm the common person. The ruler and government can always still get whatever they want.

      • xor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        021 hours ago

        There’s quite a big space between “does something” and “immediately causes the exact result desired”

        • @dontgooglefinderscult
          link
          English
          120 hours ago

          Hany many decades or centuries? We’re closing in on three quarters of a century of sanctions against Cuba and a quarter century against the Russia we built. There are less than 3% of Cubans alive right now that we’re alive when the sanctions started. Most Cubans have been born and died within the time we’ve sanctioned the country. When does cruelty towards a civilian population make them start to believe you’re the good guys?

          • xor
            link
            fedilink
            English
            120 hours ago

            I never said it makes them “believe you’re the good guys”

            I just said that claiming it doesn’t have any influence on leaders is categorically wrong

            I’d also like to note that sanctions on the USSR are generally considered a contributing factor to its collapse, so the whole “look at noughties Russia thing” is a bit silly given that it did contribute to regime change within the previous decade

            • @dontgooglefinderscult
              link
              English
              120 hours ago

              You did, as that’s the point of sanctions, to make a populace believe their government is wrong and the people doing the sanctioning are right. That is the sole attempted effect of sanctions. To punish a populace for not killing themselves against a wall in revolution, or daring to agree that should happen at all.

              It has no effect on whether a leader stays in power, or whether a leader changes course. Once a country adapts to the sanctions, they’re much more resistant to outside influence. Smart leaders do their best to make life easier for their citizens under this new way of life while the difficult transition away from global trade takes hold.

              The ussr collapsed primarily due to competing with the US in the space race and having to spend most of the rest of their limited resources on fighting off US aggression, on top of corruption that went unchecked - again primarily because police resources were being wasted fighting off us aggression, not due to sanctions.