• ComradeSharkfucker
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -322 days ago

    Your breakfast was decided for you when you were chained to the two options presented

    • @Signtist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 days ago

      Nobody was chained with 2 options. The options were chosen and rallied for by representatives picked by the people who actually thought about and participated in local government elections. (I’m dropping the metaphor, since it glosses over the process by which these 2 options came about in the first place)

      • @dontgooglefinderscult
        link
        12 days ago

        Except none of that happened this election. You can pretend it has happened as described before with some plausibility, but it absolutely did not happen this time.

        • @Signtist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 days ago

          Nobody’s pretending; Trump was only considered a legitimate presidential candidate when other GOP representatives from various states - who were elected in through local government elections - endorsed him. Were they influenced by 3rd parties looking to benefit from having a corrupt president in office? Absolutely, yes. But they only had that foothold because the local (elected!) representatives were interested in such deals. Kamala rose through the ranks to presidential candidate naturally, going through district and attorney general positions before heading to senate, all of which were elections that the people of California voted for (not many, because they were mostly-ignored local elections, but that’s the point I’m trying to make here - VOTE!!). If people wanted to stop her, that’s where they would have had the power to do it.

          Our presidential candidates didn’t pop into existence a few years ago, they were either elected themselves in local government elections before heading to presidential candidacy, or were elevated to presidential candidacy status by such locally-elected politicians. Corruption doesn’t start at the presidency, it starts with an individual who works their way up from the bottom to seize more and more power, or in Trump’s case, payments and promises made to such individuals to essentially “cut in line.” Either way, the reason they weren’t stopped is because people weren’t paying enough attention to ensure local representatives had their country’s best interests in mind.

          We flush out corruption at the same source that it starts - at the local election level, preventing power-hungry hopeful politicians from starting their career in the first place. THAT is the work that people are advocating for us to pay better attention to between the presidential elections. THAT is what we would be able to do with the time that Kamala would buy us, but Trump wouldn’t. THAT is how we fix this country without losing most of the population in a civil war. If you agree that the presidential candidates don’t have your best interests in mind, then pay better attention to the elections of the local representatives that gave them that power, and vote for one you think would make a better choice.

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        -3
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The options were chosen and rallied for by representatives picked by the people who actually thought about and participated in local government elections.

        Except one of the options was foisted onto us and no one voted for her, and the last time she ran she was so unpopular that she dropped out before the primaries.