@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 16 hours agoHarmmander.xyzimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up182arrow-down110
arrow-up172arrow-down1imageHarmmander.xyz@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 16 hours agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-square@Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 hours agofor the same reason that rulers start with 1, it would be utterly pointless to use anything else.
minus-square@ryannathans@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglish1•1 hour agoYour ruler starts with 1? How do you measure stuff between 0 and 1?
minus-square@Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglish1•40 minutes agothose are unlabeled, have you ever seen a ruler?
minus-square@F04118F@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglish19•edit-214 hours agoIt was freely chosen for simplicity. If you choose another R, the other sides (x and y) become R*cos(th) and R*sin(th) I don’t understand what is harmful about the unity circle either.
minus-squarebizarrolandlinkfedilink9•14 hours agoAny circle could have its radius technically be 1, as long as you set the units of measurement so that 1 equals the radius of the circle.
Why is it 1
for the same reason that rulers start with 1, it would be utterly pointless to use anything else.
Your ruler starts with 1? How do you measure stuff between 0 and 1?
those are unlabeled, have you ever seen a ruler?
It was freely chosen for simplicity.
If you choose another R, the other sides (x and y) become R*cos(th) and R*sin(th)
I don’t understand what is harmful about the unity circle either.
Any circle could have its radius technically be 1, as long as you set the units of measurement so that 1 equals the radius of the circle.
Because it’s a unit circle.