• @SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        225 days ago

        I thought they spoke Latin in the Vatican, aren’t they Latino? Otherwise how do we get such classical Christian idioms like “Romanes eunt domus”?

          • @samus12345@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            725 days ago

            There’s Italian, Spanish, French, Portuguese…there are more Germanic-derived ones than Latin-derived, aren’t there?

              • @samus12345@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                25 days ago

                I’d have to get a list of every country considered “western” and then figure out how many have predominantly Latin-derived and Germanic-derived languages. Too much work. “Nearly every” one of them would most certainly not be Latin-derived, though.

                • @Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  725 days ago

                  Thankfully there’s an entire field of linguistics that’s already done the work. Quick Google search shows 22 Latin descendant languages, and 24 Germanic descendant languages. So slightly more, yeah.

            • @caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              25 days ago

              I was thinking like… English.
              Sure, it’s got German and French and Greek and just a mess of everything, but there’s a lot of Latin in there.

              • @samus12345@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                4
                edit-2
                25 days ago

                English is a Germanic language that has had significant Latin and French (which added more Latin) injected into it over the years. It has to be the most mongrel widespread language in existence, which is probably why it’s such a mess when it comes to spelling. Still, it also has a lot of flexibility and word choices because of it.

    • @merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1525 days ago

      “Luz” is an incredibly common name in Spanish speaking countries. It means light. “Luce” means light in Italian, but seems to be less common as a name. Lucifer means “Light-bringer”, and the myth of the light-bringer is much, much older than Christianity.

      Old religions thought things in the sky were gods. Venus orbits closer to the sun than the Earth, which means light reflecting from it is extremely bright, but that light is only visible near sunrise and sunset. During the rest of the day the brightness of the sun overwhelms the reflected light from Venus, and during the rest of the night it’s not visible because it’s near the sun, so it’s behind the earth. So, old religions talked about the brightest “god” in the sky, who disappeared when it got too bright or too dark. That led to the myth of the god who tried to be the brightest light and was cast down. That, of course, led to Satan, A.K.A. Lucifer.

      I guess the Catholic church was giving its followers too much credit in their understanding of words.

      • @portuga@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        124 days ago

        Satan == Lucifer is wrong though. Those were two concepts that got conflated together, much beyond their original meaning

        • @merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          124 days ago

          Almost everything in any religion is a “telephone game” retelling of things. These days they’re the same to most people which is what really matters.