• Madison_rogue
    link
    fedilink
    74
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Seriously though, she chose a show that was randomly chosen by the algorithm, she watched it, and more content of that type was suggested to her by the algorithm.

    This isn’t quite rocket science.

      • @shinjiikarus@mylem.eu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        Has this story ever been confirmed by Target directly? As this happened in America and her father was outraged about it, it would have been awfully convenient, to “blame” the algorithm for “discovering”, she was pregnant. It takes quite a data analyst to figure out trends before someone even knows they are pregnant. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out a pattern for someone if they know they are pregnant and are just hiding it from their dad.

      • Madison_rogue
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        They didn’t figure anything out. There’s no sentience in the algorithm, only the creators of said algorithm. It only chose content based on input. So it all revolves around the choices of the article’s author.

        Same thing with the woman who was pregnant, the algorithm gave choices based on the user’s browsing history. It made the connection that the choice of product A was also chosen by pregnant mothers, therefore the shopper might be interested in product B which is something an expecting mother would buy.

          • Madison_rogue
            link
            fedilink
            71 year ago

            Sorry, I misunderstood your tone. Apologize for going all pedantic…it’s a character flaw.

        • @ExLisper@linux.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          I believe in case of the pregnant women she was offered diapers and stuff. Based on food she bought. So it’s no simply “you both diet coke, maybe try diet chocolate?”. In case of Netflix there’s no " A show only gay people watch" so her complaints are silly.