Two conservative lawyers make a strong 14th Amendment argument. But the politics of their theory are very, very dicey.
  • @Efwis@lemmy.zipEnglish
    6•1 year ago

    His actions are covered under 14a s3 without a conviction based on this one part:

    given aid or comfort

    By refusing to call in the national guard, and then promising to give pardons to all who were convicted fall under that clause