The blogging platform Medium is facing an influx of AI-generated content. CEO Tony Stubblebine says it “doesn’t matter” as long as nobody reads it.

archive.is link

Earlier this year, WIRED asked AI detection startup Pangram Labs to analyze Medium. It took a sampling of 274,466 recent posts over a six week period and estimated that over 47 percent were likely AI-generated. “This is a couple orders of magnitude more than what I see on the rest of the internet,” says Pangram CEO Max Spero. (The company’s analysis of one day of global news sites this summer found 7 percent as likely AI-generated.)

  • @derbis@beehaw.org
    37•24 days ago

    How well does the “AI detection startup’s” product work? This is a big unsolved problem but I’d be hecka skeptical.

    • @Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
      3•24 days ago

      That is why I liked the comparison with articles from 2018. Then you have comparable texts in the same format and can more easily figure out differences in your analysis.
      If true, a jump from 3% to 40% is significant to say the least.

        • @Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
          1•24 days ago

          In 2018, 3.4 percent were estimated as likely AI-generated.

          For 2024, with a sampling of 473 articles published this year, it suspected that just over 40 percent were likely AI-generated.

          My numbers were from the Originality AI part.