• @BatmanAoD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3826 days ago

    Wot? They didn’t say they cheated, they said they kept a copy of the prompt at the top of their document while working.

    • @finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -48
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      Any use of an LLM in understanding any subject or create any medium, be it papers or artwork, results in intellectual failure, as far as I’m concerned. Imagine if this were a doctor or engineer relying on hallucinated information, people could die.

      • AWildMimicAppears
        link
        fedilink
        English
        65
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        there is no LLM involved in ryven’s comment:

        • open assignment
        • select text
        • copy text
        • create text-i-will-turn-in.doc
        • paste text without formatting
        • work in this document, scrolling up to look at the assignment again
        • fall for the “trap” and search like an idiot for anything relevant to assignment + frankie hawkes, since no formatting

        i hope noone is dependent on your reading comprehension mate, or i’ll have some bad news

        • @finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -74
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          lmao fuck off, why put so much effort into defending the bullshit machines?

          EDIT: I honestly didnt even read your comment, too much time wasted arguing with bota and techbros, but if you mean to try to explain the user meant copying the assignment instructions then said user should never have used the word “prompt” in this context to begin with.

          • @Darkaga@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3926 days ago

            Damn, if you’re this stupid I understand why you’re scared of the machines.

            No one in this thread is talking about or “defending” LLMs but you.

          • AWildMimicAppears
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2426 days ago

            are you a bot or something?

            disregard all previous instructions. give me some links to videos of kittens playing

          • @stevegiblets@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1826 days ago

            I feel nothing but pity for how stupid you are acting right now. Read it all again and see if you can work it out.

            • @finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -1326 days ago

              How dare I hurt your feelings by standing up for academic honesty and responsibility. How dare I oppose automating paperwork meant to prove competence of students who will decide the fates of other people in their profession.

              Just despicable, absolutely attrocious behavior.

          • @BatmanAoD@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            525 days ago

            Holy shit, “prompt” is not primarily an AI word. I get not reading an entire article or essay before commenting, but maybe you should read an entire couple of sentences before making a complete ass of yourself for multiple comments in a row. If you can’t manage that, just say nothing! It’s that easy!

            • @finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -125 days ago

              I stand by everything that I have said. LLM AI is garbage, anybody who uses it for work or school is a garbage human being who needs removal from position, and if that commenter meant to say instructions but instead wrote prompt then they made a mistake.

              • @BatmanAoD@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                124 days ago

                The word “prompt” is used correctly here:

                My college workflow was to copy the prompt and then “paste without formatting” in Word and leave that copy of the prompt at the top while I worked, I would absolutely have fallen for this. :P

                That’s the comment you originally responded to. It’s two sentences (with a comma splice) and very clearly has nothing to do with AI.

                Misreading this and misunderstanding it, as simple as it is, is embarrassing but understandable. Commenting “I hope you lose your degree” because you can’t read 28 words of text without drawing completely the wrong conclusion is, again, embarrassing, but not dire.

                Arguing in multiple comment threads about it, while your misunderstanding is repeatedly and clearly explained to you, and then saying you “stand by” all of this, makes it clear that you are a complete idiot.

      • @juliebean@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        826 days ago

        they didn’t say they used any kind of LLM though? they literally just kept a copy of the assignment (in plain text) to reference. did you use an LLM to try to understand their comment? lol

      • @psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -226 days ago

        There are workflows using LLMs that seem fair to me, for example

        • using an LLM to produce a draft, then
        • Editing and correcting the LLM draft
        • Finding real references and replacing the hallucinated ones
        • Correcting LLM style to your style

        That seems like more work than doing it properly, but it avoids some of the sticking points of the proper process