Dot. to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 27 days agoNetflix Wiped Most of Its “Palestinian Stories” Collection — and Erased the Whole Thing in Israel.theintercept.comexternal-linkmessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up1622arrow-down125cross-posted to: movies@lemm.ee
arrow-up1597arrow-down1external-linkNetflix Wiped Most of Its “Palestinian Stories” Collection — and Erased the Whole Thing in Israel.theintercept.comDot. to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 27 days agomessage-square59fedilinkcross-posted to: movies@lemm.ee
minus-square@Glytch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish8•27 days agoYes they actually do. Look up Dodge v. Ford Motor Company. A business must be run in the interests of the shareholders, not the public, not the employees, not even the business itself. Is it morally right? Fuck no. Is it the law? Unfortunately yes.
minus-square@Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish11•26 days agoGrobow v. Perot, 539 A.2d 180 (Del. 1988). Directors in a business should: act in good faith; act in the best interests of the corporation; act on an informed basis; not be wasteful; not involve self-interest (duty of loyalty concept plays a role here).
minus-square@Glytch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•26 days agoFair point, I was unaware of this case.
Yes they actually do. Look up Dodge v. Ford Motor Company. A business must be run in the interests of the shareholders, not the public, not the employees, not even the business itself.
Is it morally right? Fuck no. Is it the law? Unfortunately yes.
Grobow v. Perot, 539 A.2d 180 (Del. 1988).
Directors in a business should:
Fair point, I was unaware of this case.