@Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Curated Tumblr@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 20 hours agoTake that, atheistsfiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up1273arrow-down15
arrow-up1268arrow-down1imageTake that, atheistsfiles.catbox.moe@Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Curated Tumblr@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 20 hours agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-square@atomicorange@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish58•14 hours agoImplied fact: a baby is capable of having a religion, despite its inability to comprehend the concept.
minus-squareHonkyTonkWomanlinkfedilinkEnglish5•6 hours agoImplied fact: by distinguishing the baby as Christian, there must be non-Christian babies in close proximity.
minus-square@DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish2•19 minutes agoActual Implication: You’re supposed to care more about the Christian baby than a non-Christian babies.
minus-squareHonkyTonkWomanlinkfedilinkEnglish2•14 minutes agoUnintended Implication: non-Christian babies are less likely to be hurled.
minus-square@thesporkeffect@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish12•10 hours ago7th implication: Religion is genetic
minus-square@ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglish5•10 hours agoI mean, Jewish boys go through a ritual to mark them as part of the religion and christening occurs early too, so I would say that religious people usually assume the baby’s religion.
minus-square@BallsandBayonetslinkEnglish8•9 hours agoNon-jewish boys often go through the same ritual, even in a jew-hating religion, because of “tradition”.
minus-square@ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglish1•4 hours agoNot in my country. But my point still stands as long as there is religious significance to the ritual for some.
Implied fact: a baby is capable of having a religion, despite its inability to comprehend the concept.
Implied fact: by distinguishing the baby as Christian, there must be non-Christian babies in close proximity.
Actual Implication: You’re supposed to care more about the Christian baby than a non-Christian babies.
Unintended Implication: non-Christian babies are less likely to be hurled.
7th implication: Religion is genetic
I mean, Jewish boys go through a ritual to mark them as part of the religion and christening occurs early too, so I would say that religious people usually assume the baby’s religion.
Non-jewish boys often go through the same ritual, even in a jew-hating religion, because of “tradition”.
Not in my country. But my point still stands as long as there is religious significance to the ritual for some.