• @Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    42 months ago

    “the US doesn’t like”

    OMG, like North Korea isn’t bad, it’s just the US that “doesn’t like them”.

    Anyobe not knowing North Korea is the worst dictatorship on planet earth should get their brain tested.

    I mean this is what OP talks about (or so I feel), people so out of touch you can’t even have a normal discussion with them.

    It’s like talking about sexual abuse and someone saying that the person raped is now not “liking” the rapist, but a million times worse.

    • @Aeao@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      72 months ago

      I’m a capitalist. The person you are responding to sounded very reasonable.

      “the US doesn’t like”

      That’s very true. The us does not like north Korea. That isn’t saying north Korea is good. It’s just saying there are motives at play to make north Korea look as bad as possible.

      If I said Jeffrey Epstein was a cannibal, you can say “no he wasn’t” without thinking he was a good person.

      • @alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Not really important, but a capitalist is someone who has a significant amount of capital.

        Someone who supports the existence of capitalism is called a liberal.

        • @Aeao@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          Yes someone explain my poor phrasing. They even mentioned the word I mentioned but I forget.

          I’m not the capitalist version of a tanky.

          I believe the concept of capitalism could work, and I believe it would work better than socialism. Another common ground I have with socialist is that I understand the examples of my preferred… Arrangement of society have been corrupted and not run under the ideas they claim.

          That’s what I mean by common ground and that’s where I sympathize. I wouldn’t want someone pointing at trump and saying “that’s capitalism!” And I would never point at Kim jun un and say “that’s socialism”

          I also understand the “ideal, pure, perfect implementation” of either idea probably isn’t possible.

          I lean more to capitalism.

          That’s what I meant when I said “I’m a capitalist” I misspoke.

        • @Aeao@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          Funny side note I think the problem with both systems is lazy people not doing what they should.

          I won’t go over the example for how lazy people could effect socialism because I’m sure you’ve heard it a million times before.

          I skip straight to capitalism.

          People don’t vote with their dollar like they should. Everyone hates Walmart, they still shop at Walmart. Everyone hates child slavery, they still buy chocolate. Women want real pockets in their clothing, they still buy clothing that does not have pockets.

          I’m lazy too in that way. I don’t shop at Walmart, and I don’t really like chocolate… But I hate how shitty airlines are… When I fly tho, I buy the cheapest ticket on the cheapest airline. Every single time.

          That’s the problem with capitalism. I’m lazy, we’re all lazy.

          • @rekabis@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            12 months ago

            It’s not laziness.

            Most people are too resource poor, too time poor, and too exhausted from being violently forced to be profitable to someone else, to have the headspace to do what you suggest.

            You can indeed spend every waking moment optimizing your life, but then you would be just one person among tens of thousands who could be successful doing that. 99.999% of people would utterly burn out trying to achieve the same. They don’t have the underlying intergenerational wealth that would give them the ability to do so, or don’t have the free time to do so, or have too high of a cognitive load just putting one foot in front of the other to do so. Vanishingly few people are “just too lazy” to do so, and of those who are, they are the ones who can monetarily afford to be lazy.

            It’s why poverty is fiendishly expensive, and why it is almost impossible to escape poverty

            • @Aeao@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              12 months ago

              I’m new to this platform and can’t tell if I already replied to this or not.

              I totally understand and agree with your point. In case I already replied to this I’ll just give my short answer.

              If I could snap my finger and magically make a perfect capitalist system (or socialist for that matter) no corruption or greed. Starting absolutely fresh and right with the perfect principles in place for the system… And also all of us people started fresh, well rested, well fed, thinking clearly…

              I think people would still buy the cheapest chocolate and ignore the slaves, they’d still shop at Walmart, and I’d still book the cheap airline ticket and complain I have no leg room, and a handful of super rich elites would quickly regain literally all the power.

              You absolutely nailed it on the head with everything thing you said, that’s exactly why I don’t call out system true capitalism. I also agree the lives we are forced to live prevent us from having time to sort this stuff out.

              I just don’t think we’d be less lazy (myself included) even if we did have the time and energy. I feel the same problem in both systems.

              1)good idea

              1. revaluation

              2. get lazy

              3. back to essentially where we started.

      • @Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -62 months ago

        What on earth do you think you saying you are a capitalist does?

        There are smart communists, and as you so succinctly prove, capitalists that are less so.

    • @rekabis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      12 months ago

      OMG, like North Korea isn’t bad, it’s just the US that “doesn’t like them”.

      You’re linking North Korea to the conversation about communism, when that alone is a fatal error: NK is equally as much communistic as they are democratic. As in, not in the least.

      There has never been any kind of a long-term (5+ years) communist country on the planet. Prior power structures have always stepped in to decapitate communism in favour of a violently autocratic dictatorship much like a monarchy. What remained of communism was only ever kept as a thin veneer of legitimacy, much like a rotting Edgar suit.

    • OBJECTION!
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This is what I’m talking about. The US not liking North Korea is an objective fact. But because people on the internet treat whatever you last posted as your entire identity and belief system, then you assume that’s the full extent of my position on North Korea. You expect me to do the typical signals to disavow and denounce the country as part of the strategy of the Western left distancing itself from AES states. But I’m not interested in signalling anything, for the reasons I explained. The strategy of allowing and repeating all sorts of sensationalist nonsense for fear that pushing back against it will tie you to the state in question just doesn’t work.

      Is North Korea really “the worst dictatorship on planet Earth?” Are they worse than, for example, Saudi Arabia? Are they so much obviously worse that anyone who thinks Saudi Arabia is worse “should get their brain tested?”

      It’s like talking about sexual abuse and someone saying that the person raped is now not “liking” the rapist, but a million times worse.

      Ok, maybe you’re right. Perhaps it’s important to mention the horrible things the US and North Korea have done to each other. Like when the US invaded and killed 15% of their entire population (primarily civilians), carpet bombed the country, and deployed all sorts of chemical weapons, or when North Korea, er, sorry, what did North Korea do to America that’s “a million times worse than rape?” Gonna have to refresh my memory on that one chief.