Nemeski to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-210 hours agoReddit says it is not covered by new Online Safety Code as it has moved its jurisdiction to the Netherlandswww.independent.ieexternal-linkmessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1504arrow-down18
arrow-up1496arrow-down1external-linkReddit says it is not covered by new Online Safety Code as it has moved its jurisdiction to the Netherlandswww.independent.ieNemeski to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-210 hours agomessage-square82fedilink
minus-squareℬ𝒶𝓃𝒶𝓃𝒶linkfedilinkEnglish26•7 hours agoI disagree since I think censorship can be desired when combatting hate speech. Maybe we just disagree how exactly we use the word ‘censorship’.
minus-square@disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•edit-27 hours agoWho would you have define hate speech in the US? SCOTUS? Many citizens may agree on the definition, but I wouldn’t trust our government to draw those lines.
minus-squareddhlinkfedilinkEnglish7•3 hours agoMany countries have working anti-hate speech laws. It’s not really a big problem for freedom of speech in those countries.
minus-square@disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish8•edit-23 hours agoThose countries don’t have partisan polarization propaganda preschoolers writing their legislation.
minus-square@Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish1•58 minutes agoYep it’s great Hate speech ✖️ Alliteration ✔️ Simple :)
I disagree since I think censorship can be desired when combatting hate speech. Maybe we just disagree how exactly we use the word ‘censorship’.
Who would you have define hate speech in the US? SCOTUS?
Many citizens may agree on the definition, but I wouldn’t trust our government to draw those lines.
Many countries have working anti-hate speech laws. It’s not really a big problem for freedom of speech in those countries.
Those countries don’t have partisan polarization propaganda preschoolers writing their legislation.
Yep it’s great
Hate speech ✖️
Alliteration ✔️
Simple :)