asudox to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 18 hours agoConcerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square107fedilinkarrow-up1526arrow-down17 cross-posted to: selfhosted@lemmy.worldlinux@programming.devlinux@lemmy.worldbitwarden@discuss.tchncs.denews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
arrow-up1519arrow-down1external-linkConcerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comasudox to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 18 hours agomessage-square107fedilink cross-posted to: selfhosted@lemmy.worldlinux@programming.devlinux@lemmy.worldbitwarden@discuss.tchncs.denews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
minus-square@schizo@forum.uncomfortable.businesslinkfedilinkEnglish24•16 hours agoDon’t forget option 3: someone writes a vaultwarden client independent of the closed-source crap. If you can write a server that fully supports the client via the documented API, then you know everything you’d need to do to make a client as well.
minus-square@humorlessrepost@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish12•11 hours agoThat’s not a third option in the same list (things they are going to do), it’s an item in an entirely different list (foss responses to their actions).
Don’t forget option 3: someone writes a vaultwarden client independent of the closed-source crap.
If you can write a server that fully supports the client via the documented API, then you know everything you’d need to do to make a client as well.
That’s not a third option in the same list (things they are going to do), it’s an item in an entirely different list (foss responses to their actions).