No Democrat has won a statewide race in Texas in decades. But conditions are friendlier than ever.

There’s a reason no Democrat has accomplished a statewide victory in Texas since 1994.

Pulling off such an upset would require a uniquely talented politician running an almost perfect campaign. That candidate would need to display discipline, calm and poise. Be telegenic and quick on the feet. The candidate would need to be thoroughly Texan and have an identity infused with elements of the state’s cultural zeitgeist. The person would need to run in a halfway decent national political environment. And even with all of those boxes checked, that rare Democrat would still need to square off against an extraordinarily disliked Republican running a lackluster campaign without much support from the person’s own colleagues.

Enter: Rep. Colin Allred.

Allred’s remarkable debate performance Tuesday spawned a flurry of Instagram slides, TikTok videos and X posts. Both in Texas and nationwide, news feeds have been flush this week with clips of the former professional football player rebuking Sen. Ted Cruz for hiding in a “supply closet” during the attempted insurrection at the U.S. Capitol — a riot by a mob that Cruz himself helped whip up. Others showed him repeatedly referencing the time Cruz flew to Cancun, Mexico, as hundreds of Texans died during the middle of a winter freeze, or hammering him on his abortion stance — an issue critical to white female voters who have been abandoning the GOP in droves.

But an impressive debate performance alone is not enough for a Democrat to win a state like Texas. However, polls, fundraising and a changing political climate have all looked promising for Allred. Today, Texas Democrats are in an extraordinary situation, one that has proved elusive over the past three decades: They have an actual chance of winning a statewide race.

  • @IcePee@lemmy.beru.co
    link
    fedilink
    231 month ago

    I remember similar being said about Beto O’Rourke. In the end he floundered on the rocks of Cruz’s candacy.

    • trevor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      64
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Beto likely lost because he said the stupidest shit that a dem running in Texas could have said (“we will take your guns!”) and it killed his campaign momentum. And even then, he only lost by 2-3%.

      To my knowledge, Allred hasn’t shot himself in the foot like that, so there is a real chance for him to win.

      • @rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        71 month ago

        we will take your guns

        I mean, he could have retconned it into asking for their active participation in something requiring guns

        • @Thunderbird4@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          14
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          He could have, yes.

          Instead, he doubled down on it and continued his campaign essentially with the message “Yes, I really do want to take away certain guns. Vote for me, Texans!”

          • @rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -11 month ago

            Even there he could have said something about illegal alien ghetto cocaine-smuggling communist cartel guns, though.

            But OK, it’s just the kind of humor that pleases me to write is not the same as what fits the subject

      • @WHARRGARBL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        41 month ago

        Get your facts straight. Beto did not speak about gun control during his Senate campaign.

        The year after he lost the Senate race to Cruz, Beto briefly campaigned for POTUS. It was during his presidential campaign that he brought up removing AR-15s and spoke about gun buyback programs.

        Speaking about guns did not cost Beto the Texas Senate race because Beto is not a time traveler.