• dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    83
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    In its day Winamp was the most comprehensive media player and users were super into its skinability which was a big deal at the time. Nowadays the “plays everything” throne is very firmly occupied by VLC, with a little cushioned stool next to it for Media Player Classic to sit on. However, neither of them offer the user interface experience that Winamp does/did.

    Winamp was iTunes before iTunes. It was Spotify before Spotify. It did an excellent job of managing the hordes of totally legitimate MP3’s we all had back in the day, and did so with an aplomb that nothing else seemed to manage. Really, its playlist and library management was top notch. Newer apps still piss me off because none of them do it the way Winamp did.

    Side note, if you have an old iPod kicking around and don’t feel like dealing with Apple’s ecosystem, Winamp can still, to this very day, stick music on your device natively without having to install or use iTunes. Just saying.

    But this source code release thing really baffles me. I have no idea what the point of that was supposed to be.

    • @btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 month ago

      Really, its playlist and library management was top notch. Newer apps still piss me off because none of them do it the way Winamp did.

      It’s why I still use winamp.

      • @eronth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        It’s been a while since I’ve used Winamp, so I might just not remember, but what makes the library management so special?

    • @CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 month ago

      It did an excellent job of managing the hordes of totally legitimate MP3’s we all had back in the day, and did so with an aplomb that nothing else seemed to manage. Really, its playlist and library management was top notch.

      This is why I’m still on the eternal search for a replacement. Library management was really, really good in Winamp. I use Strawberry these days and it’s absolutely great at playing stuff but the playlist management is just ‘good enough’.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 month ago

        If you’re running Windows you can still use old versions of Winamp.

        On Linux, I dunno. I’ll bet you it’ll run in Wine.

        • @CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          Yep, I still use 5.666 on Windows, but I use Windows very infrequently anymore. I switched to Linux as my primary OS earlier this year and only use Windows for games that don’t work right in Linux. And thanks to Valve that’s becoming pretty rare these days.

          I haven’t tried getting Winamp to work in Wine but there’s probably a guide out there somewhere! Good suggestion, thanks.

          • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 month ago

            WineDB has it marked as silver.

            Honestly, for a modern PC I can’t imagine Winamp is all that taxing of a program to run. I think the biggest bugbear will be its fairly tight integration with the Windows shell for file management and enqueuing things from an Explorer window, and maybe the external device integrations which would rely heavily on the Windows API and possibly WDM.

            • @toddestan@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 month ago

              The video player in Winamp is also completely non-functional in Wine the last time I tried it, as it relies on DirectShow in Windows which has very iffy Wine support. That may also be why it’s marked as silver.

              It’s too bad as I really liked using Winamp as a video player in Windows, despite it’s quirks.