• @kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 month ago

    Liberals absolutely arent centrists, Social Democrats are centrist. Liberals are right wing, fundamentally you cannot be a leftist while supporting a “free” capitalist economy and minimal government (thats what Liberalism is).

          • @kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I accidently responded to the wrong message last time. In the vast majority of countries Liberal is right wing, America is an outlier because of the red scare. Fundamentally Liberalism isnt left wing, its just the most left wing option Americans have so they they see it as left wing. Fundamentally if you believe in private property, capitalism, few social programs, funding genocide, and imperialism you are a right winger.

            (Ex: the German political spectrum)

        • @disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -61 month ago

          From your linked article:

          The diversity of liberalism can be gleaned from the numerous qualifiers that liberal thinkers and movements have attached to the term “liberalism”, including classical, egalitarian, economic, social, the welfare state, ethical, humanist, deontological, perfectionist, democratic, and institutional, to name a few. Despite these variations, liberal thought does exhibit a few definite and fundamental conceptions.

          Yup. A single set definition alright.🙄

          • @TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            151 month ago

            And they all still enshrine the sanctity of private property which was my point when referencing the definition. All the variations of liberalism still boil down to a capitalist ideology.

            • @disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Again, this meme is suggesting that liberals are against any form of wealth redistribution. Capitalism and wealth redistribution are not mutually exclusive. Social programs, funded through taxation, is a form of wealth redistribution commonly found in capitalist nations.

              • @TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 month ago

                Didn’t say you couldn’t attempt some wealth redistribution under capitalism but it’s not really related to what the discussion was. The left/right dichotomy for political economics isn’t based on whether there’s an attempt at wealth redistribution it’s whether the economic system is capitalism.

                Also at the end of the day you can try to gain concessions from the capitalist class through social programs but there’s a hard limit on what will be allowed and as soon as the capitalist class is able to they will push for austerity for the working class. It’s been seen numerous times in history.

                • @disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  01 month ago

                  A liberal’s opinion on wealth redistribution exactly what the meme references, as well as the comment thread you’re responding to.

                  • @TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    4
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    The specific comment I responded to was talking about whether liberals are leftists.

                    If you’re asking whether I believe liberals support a little wealth distribution (specific amount depends on the individual) in the form of taxes for social programs I’d say yes the meme isn’t absolutely correct.

                    I’d also probably recommend to you just to save you time is to not take leftist memes (or any really) as a literal/specific endorsement of a policy or idea, it’s likely an exaggeration.