Sjmarf to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works • 22 hours agoThe value of xsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square116fedilinkarrow-up1986arrow-down119
arrow-up1967arrow-down1imageThe value of xsh.itjust.worksSjmarf to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works • 22 hours agomessage-square116fedilink
minus-square@Siethron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•5 minutes ago135, that’s not a 90 degree angle in the problem. Just visually.
minus-square@LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-25 minutes agoNah, the imagery tricks you. 180 degrees to a line. 180 degrees inside a triangle. So you can gather the inside unlabeled angle on the triangle on the left is only 80 degrees: (180-[60+40]) So you then know it’s 100 on the right side of that +35 leaves you with 45 degrees left for the top of the right one. 180-45=. 135 degrees
I think 125
135, that’s not a 90 degree angle in the problem. Just visually.
Nah, the imagery tricks you. 180 degrees to a line. 180 degrees inside a triangle.
So you can gather the inside unlabeled angle on the triangle on the left is only 80 degrees: (180-[60+40])
So you then know it’s 100 on the right side of that +35 leaves you with 45 degrees left for the top of the right one.
180-45=. 135 degrees