• @dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    39
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    What’s clear is that the Right-wing’s whole thing doesn’t exactly attract (good) artists. They tend to borrow and steal most of their iconography rather than make something new1. Strangely, the whole movement also seems to be both unable to execute parody nor see the humor in self-parody, which I assert is a faculty needed to pull off good political art.

    So that puts some serious creative power in league with everyone else. Should be interesting.

    1 - MAGA is a great example of this. The slogan itself is lifted from Reagan’s 1980 campaign, so it’s nothing new. The current slogan marketing “design” is nothing more than a white serif font on a red field, which in highly-technical graphic design terms is called: “lazy as fuck.”

    • @abbotsbury@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      341 month ago

      The slogan itself is lifted from Reagan’s 1980 campaign, so it’s nothing new

      …Which in turn lifted it from the National Front’s “Make Britain Great Again,” which is the last time it was actually clever wordplay.

    • Schadrach
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      What’s clear is that the Right-wing’s whole thing doesn’t exactly attract (good) artists.

      Not a fan of their views, but the likes of StoneToss, Tom MacDonald and Seamus Coughlin aren’t exactly bad at what they do.

      They tend to borrow and steal most of their iconography rather than make something new

      The counter argument would be that having a visual language of common symbols and representations allows you to convey a lot with a little. One of the running bits from TheLeftCantMeme crowd is that left wing memes and comics tend to rely on walls of text to express anything, which is an exaggeration but it’s not entirely wrong.