• @TORFdot0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    252 months ago

    Most VPNs sell themselves on encrypting your traffic to an endpoint that either is in a different locale to get around region locks or to put it out of the grasp of the RIAA so they can’t send your ISP copyright notices.

    While remote access to a local network is a good use case for a self-hosted VPN it’s totally unrelated to the use case for commercial VPNs

    • @stephen01king@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 months ago

      For the use case of encrypting your traffic while using a public WiFi, both commercial VPNs and self-hosted ones provide the same functionality.

      • @OR3X@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        122 months ago

        I think the point they’re getting at Is that you can’t use a self-hosted vpn to hide your piracy activity because the link is registered to yourself.

        • @stephen01king@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 months ago

          Yes, but this thread is about security while using public Wi-Fi, which the original comment was saying doesn’t require commercial VPNs.

          • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            And I highly doubt people are pirating while on public wi-fi, the bandwidth just isn’t good enough, and even if it was, it would be a dick move to other public wi-fi users.

      • @TORFdot0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        Yes that’s true. But also that’s the wink and nudge marketing claim that VPN marketers make while everyone knows the real reason you are using a VPN.

        With HTTPS, DNS-over-HTTPS, and most endpoint firewalls dropping non-gateway traffic, the risk is a lot less than the VPN ad reads want you to believe

        • @stephen01king@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          DNS-over-HTTPS sounds like it’ll be the least used by general public since most people I know are still using default DNS settings which would point towards their ISP’s. I’m not sure how many ISPs have moved towards DNS-over-HTTPS or if they are even activated by default.

          • exu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            Firefox has DoT enabled by default, maybe Chrome does the same. That would cover the use-case of most people on public wifi.

              • exu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 months ago

                Both, the browsers (and any other application) can choose to ignore your DNS settings and use whatever other mechanisms they like.