• @TacticsConsort@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    503 months ago

    I have to ask. What about this movie is so bad

    I haven’t seen it, I hadn’t even heard of it until yesterday. But you don’t get a flop THIS epic without some Morbius tier blunders

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      59
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I haven’t seen it and, although I know it gets panned a lot for various reasons, I highly recommend at least reading the snippets of reviews of the film by critics to get an idea. Even a lot of the so-called positive films are basically ‘this movie clearly sucks, but I liked it anyway.’

      Basically, it’s a very expensive, pretty, and totally incoherent mess of a film that a few people feel is profound but most people think is a colossal piece of shit.

      https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/megalopolis/reviews

      Also, some theaters have a lady stand in front of the screen and lip synch to a specific scene and then leave for some reason. Don’t ask me to explain that.

      Edit: also, that link provides you with gems like this one from Richard Roeper-

      • @TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        it’s a very expensive, pretty, and totally incoherent mess of a film that a few people feel is profound but most people think is a colossal piece of shit.

        It sounds like what people should have thought about Inception, but everyone instead apparently fucking loved that movie.

        All the hate given toward Megalopolis makes me want to see it. Before that, I wasn’t interested just based on the poster.

        • @lobut@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          83 months ago

          I eventually want to see Megalopolis too.

          I like watching art house movies and then figuring out what I don’t like about it. Even the ones everyone loves. Magnolia was one people loved and I just didn’t get.

          • @TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            43 months ago

            Yeah, well the thing is for me a lot of those types of movies are great but some are absolute trash. And then there are some that I have a lot of mixed feelings about. I don’t really get most David Lynch movies for example, but I’ve rarely felt like watching them were a waste of time because at least you’ll see something interesting. Then there’s total bizarre experience films. I have no fucking clue what Holy Mountain was, but I was fascinated by it.

            • Flying SquidOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              23 months ago

              I could not get through The Holy Mountain. I like some art films, but not the ones that drag. That one seriously dragged.

              • @TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                33 months ago

                I sort of enjoyed it. Like I said, it was bizarre and confusing but I’m glad weird movies like that can be made sometimes. If nothing else just to explore what can be done on film.

            • @Denjin
              link
              English
              13 months ago

              The issue with this film however seems to be that not only is it incoherent and rambling, it’s also incredibly dull.

          • @Rolando@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            I like watching art house movies and then figuring out what I don’t like about it.

            Have you seen Aimy in a Cage? It’s a great example of that. It’s an art house film that does many things right, but unfortunately “something” wrong (I think related to editing or cinematography) so it’s not very good.

        • Flying SquidOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          33 months ago

          Okay, but just so you know, it’s 2 hours and 18 minutes long.

          • @TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            33 months ago

            Yeah, depends on the film if that’s long or not. Lawrence of Arabia is one of my favorite movies. It is 3:45 long, and I’m glad they didn’t cut it shorter.

    • RBG
      link
      fedilink
      English
      183 months ago

      Maybe they megaloped around?

    • @BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      Nah it’s just an expensive passion project art movie. It was never going to make money, it was Francis Ford Coppola finishing his last project that’s he’s been working on. I quite enjoyed it, despite there being obvious flaws, and many things that would make your average viewer not really care.

      It can be a bit dated in references but generally they all land. There isn’t really a single unifying message which is what I would say is the biggest problem. It’s more interested in asking questions and posing that against our current real world than actually trying to answer them.

      Apart from that the performances are generally all good, and while the characters feel like archetypes as opposed to clearly defined people, it works, for me at least.

      It’s also just really weird. There’s dream sequences but seemingly they aren’t, just a perspective shift of what’s actually happening.

      Overall I’d much rather watch Megalopolis than whatever Disney Corporate Movie Product comes out next. I’d prefer misses the mark but tries for something different and interesting, over cookie cutter formulaic plot beats and generic quippy characters.