Diplomats walk out on Israeli prime minister’s speech at UN to protest against devastating war on Gaza and latest attacks on Lebanon

  • RubberDuck
    link
    fedilink
    English
    100
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The UN is a forum for dialogue. Expecting the UN to do something other than either say stuff or help by mandate supported by countries just shows you don’t understand what their purpose is.

    Walking out in this case sends the message. If these countries want to do something about it they can, other countries might intervene on Israëls behalf. The UN provides a forum to discuss this kind of stuff. So countries don’t end up in wars they did not want.

    • @brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      Maybe so… but I feel like this is one of the biggest mistakes in the post WWII order. Imagine what things would be like if the UN had more teeth (and no security council)

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        Imagine what things would be like if the UN had more teeth (and no security council)

        well then russia would be right about NATO lmao

          • KillingTimeItself
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            If the UN had those powers, it would essentially be what russia accuses NATO of being. A body with the ability to regulate bodies outside of it’s own jurisdiction.

            Russia likes to shitpost about NATO being an existential threat to russia/china whatever, even though that’s not true. The UN would essentially become this version of NATO. Just not militarily, which is good enough for russia lol.

      • RubberDuck
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        I have a hard time imagining how that would work. Because teeth would mean there is a mechanism that could ultimately force countries to supply warm bodies to do enforcement.

    • @RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -19
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      If these countries want to do something about it they can

      Yes, but they don’t. They go grab a coffee. Look, I know many countries are very vocal about their disagreement. I’m just so pissed there are still others (mine included) that seem to be absolutely blind to any of the atrocities and respond with neverending loyalty. In my county I even understand that to a degree, but still I’m beyond pissed. Accepting the genocide your ancestors caused and the moral consequences of it shouldn’t result in accepting another one driven by former victims. What Israel does is vile and unacceptable. And I say Israel, not the Israelis or ‘the Jews’, because I’m not a complete idiot. But there are people who might use the antisemite card on this. Maybe because they are complete idiots, or because they are off the same ideals and moral as the Nazis. And this behavior sickens me.

      • RubberDuck
        link
        fedilink
        English
        132 months ago

        Well yes, the risk that is present is that if countries where to openly intervene and wage war against Israël, the US would intervene on the side of Israel.

        Talking in the UN allows them to weigh their options, which allows them to make more informed decisions. Regardless of the subject matter at hand.

        • @RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          I’m not talking about war with Israel. But condemning them. Stopping trade. Calling in diplomats. There’s a lot of granularity between peace and war.

            • @RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -42 months ago

              I think it is. As soft and vanilla as they get. Meanwhile people are dying by the hundreds and thousands a day. I’m not sure if the reaction meets the required pressure.