flamingos-cant to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish • 2 months agoMaths rulefiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1321arrow-down116
arrow-up1305arrow-down1imageMaths rulefiles.catbox.moeflamingos-cant to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-square@driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.brlinkfedilink2•2 months agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_quantification I usually used it as “for all”, but its looks like “for any” is used too
minus-square@Poik@pawb.sociallinkfedilink1•2 months agoI sit corrected. It’s used as an arbitrary singular value within the proof, so for any always felt more appropriate.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_quantification
I usually used it as “for all”, but its looks like “for any” is used too
I sit corrected. It’s used as an arbitrary singular value within the proof, so for any always felt more appropriate.