• @Vipsu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    912 months ago

    Lemmy support would be much more fitting for Mozilla. They could add plugin or lemmy integration to their browser that could show discussions from subscribed communities matching the current url.

    Effectively acting as a “comment section” but for any page. One would only need lemmy account to comment on youtube videos, news articles, blogs etc.

    • @mke@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      392 months ago

      I didn’t want to rain on your parade, but:

      • Firefox has hundreds of millions of users.
      • Lemmy has less than half a million total users, and YTD MAU peaked at 52k.

      Even putting aside technical details, I fail to see how “Lemmy integration in the browser” could be a good product strategy. A plugin/extension can also be developed by independent developers, which seems much more fitting for the size of the target demographic. Maybe I’m missing something.

      • @Vipsu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        Well since they were/are hosting Mastodon instance they do seem to have some interest in the fediverse. They do also have official plugins.

        Personally I feel something like this could be the next step for social link aggregation and discussion platforms. Being able to share and discuss on about videos and articles without having to register to dozens or more pages while also having some control over the people you interract with through instances, subscribed communities etc.

        Source media would also be unable to control what can or cannot be discussed. Many youtube videos and news articles for example may block all comments. It would be up to community on how to moderate discussion.

    • @Clbull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 months ago

      Gab tried to pull the same thing with their Dissenter plugin. It was such a bad idea that Mozilla and Google banded together to remove the extensions from their stores for ToS violations.

      Now imagine what a nightmare it would be to moderate the ability to comment on anything online with actual standards and decency.

      • @rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 months ago

        Why was it a bad idea? Seems like a wonderful idea. Minus Gab.

        Some kind of web of trust and inheriting ignored users based on it and weights - and it will work.

          • @rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            Not necessarily and only those you comment.

            That’s the point, to comment any webpage. It’s clear you visited it if you comment it.

            • @treadful@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 months ago

              Presumably it loads comments when you visit a page. That would send a request with the URL to whatever service they’re running.

              • @rottingleaf@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 months ago

                Unless you make a p2p system and search comments by page hash in some way (maybe just over I2P?) making it hard for other nodes to understand from which node it comes and which node downloads those comments.

                OK, I agree. Not very good. But in theory it can be better.