@MashedTech@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 3 days agoI redid the meme with what hurts melemmy.worldimagemessage-square99fedilinkarrow-up1712arrow-down124 cross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.devprogrammerhumor@lemmy.world
arrow-up1688arrow-down1imageI redid the meme with what hurts melemmy.world@MashedTech@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml • 3 days agomessage-square99fedilink cross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.devprogrammerhumor@lemmy.world
minus-square@menemen@lemmy.mllinkfedilink4•3 days agoIs it better than R? I am not so much into python (too embedded in R).
minus-square@dudinax@programming.devlinkfedilink2•2 days agoI guess I don’t know. Whenever something tempts me to R, I quickly find that Python’s got a good-enough solution.
minus-square@Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•2 days agoR is better if you want some very specific, niche statistical packages. Python is better if you want to combine statistics with any other compute process.
minus-square@menemen@lemmy.mllinkfedilink3•2 days agoSame for me with python, I always fall back to R after 10 minutes of trying to do it in python. :)
Is it better than R? I am not so much into python (too embedded in R).
I guess I don’t know. Whenever something tempts me to R, I quickly find that Python’s got a good-enough solution.
R is better if you want some very specific, niche statistical packages.
Python is better if you want to combine statistics with any other compute process.
Same for me with python, I always fall back to R after 10 minutes of trying to do it in python. :)