• @crashfrog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    -33 months ago

    I’ve gone to every link you’ve provided to me and none of them were a UN study.

    Because you won’t read past the abstract. I can only give you the sources; I can’t make you read them.

    Also a funny story, one link I provided you had multiple IPC reports.

    You didn’t provide a link.

    t. Or you wouldn’t have said something so demonstrably false about Gazan aid being turned around.

    It’s not a news story about aid being turned around in Gaza. It’s a news story about aid being turned around at the Gazan border because it contains impermissible dual-use items that are forbidden in aid shipments to Gaza.

    Finally, accusing UNRWA of incompetence while blocking and attacking their aid convoys has been an Israeli propaganda line for most of the past ~10 months.

    You’re correct that it’s propaganda but you’ve misattributed it. It’s Hamas propaganda.

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      23 months ago

      If the paper says something the abstract doesn’t then it’s a bad paper or a bad abstract.

      I absolutely provided a link, it’s even labeled, “IPC Report Link”.

      And no. The news article is very clear these checkpoints are inside Gaza, not at the border. Which again is there for you and everyone else to read.

      And lmao you think Hamas is what? Paying the UN to say they’ve been attacked by Israel? You know what don’t answer that. I’m not sure why I even replied to this post since it’s very obvious your only angle here is to deny all evidence of Israel’s crimes. No matter how damning.

      • @crashfrog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        03 months ago

        If the paper says something the abstract doesn’t then it’s a bad paper or a bad abstract.

        The whole point of an abstract is that it’s not the entire paper, stupid