• @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It’s not mundane for me or where I live but their post mentioned the wife was Jewish and I assumed the person was American, in both of those cases it’d be a very mundane topic when it comes to babies.

    You should consider this from their context, not yours or mine.

    • @Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -24 months ago

      I’m sort of tired of repeating myself…

      Yes, I understand that FOR AMERICANS, the genital mutilation of infants is very mundane.

      The point I’m making is that we know that “what people are used to” doesn’t define what is right or wrong. We know that. Granted, it’s hard to say where exactly morals come from, but when we face something that feels grossly immoral, we have a strong feeling about it. Like say things having to do with the genitals of defenseless infants.

      The shocking part in this is how it’s acceptable for some — like you — that some people do accept these things. There’s a whole lot of shit that say, former fascist states have done, which would be beyond horrendous, even if somewhat “mundane” to the people living in those states at those times. I’m sure you wouldn’t say “you should consider it from X perspective” if I was talking about that, because you’d realise I’m not talking about the morality of the controversial thing, I’m talking about how shocking it is how easily we (humans in general) can make horrendous things feel mundane by being exposed to them for a while, despite there still being knowledge that that thing isn’t okay. so essentially it’s willfull ignorance of something we know to be wrong, and the fact that we can do that so easily…

      • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        I wasn’t talking about right or wrong, just what is normal or mundane. I haven’t taken any moral position on that.

            • @Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -14 months ago

              So you agree that you should have an opinion on this, when you just explicitly avoided that, despite that having been my point all along?

              Ei tarvinnu kyllä nickiä kattoa että tunnisti suomalaisen.

              • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                14 months ago

                I have always had an opinion about it, I just don’t see a reason to bring it up when it is not the point of what I’m saying. That could be a little obnoxious.

                • @Dasus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  04 months ago

                  Oh yes, it would just be totally obnoxious to voice an opinion against child genital mutilation, on a FORUM.

                  “If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse, and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality.”

                  ― Desmond Tutu (Foreword)

                  • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    24 months ago

                    If it’s on a place where everyone already agrees and it’s not even the point of what I was saying then yes, it can be pretty obnoxious.

                    If you are neutral

                    I’m not neutral though.