Roflmasterbigpimp to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 18 days agoMaybe this is better for everyonelocklemmy.worldimagemessage-square459fedilinkarrow-up1591arrow-down1101
arrow-up1490arrow-down1imageMaybe this is better for everyonelocklemmy.worldRoflmasterbigpimp to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 18 days agomessage-square459fedilink
minus-square@commie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilink2•17 days agoright. it’s simply not scoped to support the claim tha being vegan is 30% cheaper
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish0•17 days agoWhat they claimed was “a whole foods plant-based diet is 30% cheaper.” Which is factually supported by the study, even if you’d prefer to interpret it to mean something else
minus-square@commie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilink2•17 days ago What they claimed was “a whole foods plant-based diet is 30% cheaper.” Which is factually supported by the study …for a limited segment of the population.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish0•edit-217 days agoIt’s actually not speaking about the personal costs born by consumers, it’s talking about the cost of purchasing food for the diet. As I said, if the paper was discussing the systemic hurtles and personal choices of consumers it would be a different paper, saying a different thing.
right. it’s simply not scoped to support the claim tha being vegan is 30% cheaper
What they claimed was “a whole foods plant-based diet is 30% cheaper.”
Which is factually supported by the study, even if you’d prefer to interpret it to mean something else
…for a limited segment of the population.
It’s actually not speaking about the personal costs born by consumers, it’s talking about the cost of purchasing food for the diet.
As I said, if the paper was discussing the systemic hurtles and personal choices of consumers it would be a different paper, saying a different thing.