• @sugartits@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    334 months ago

    What has encryption got to do with it?

    Most of telegram is not encrypted. There are unencrypted channels on telegram right now hosting child pornography. Telegram never removes them.

    • @HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      Good. They shouldn’t.

      Unencrypted channels are the ones that are easiest to trace, and the easiest ones to successfully base a prosecution on.

      The most correct response is to report them to law enforcement. Unencrypted channels make amazingly effective honeypots. It’s fairly easy to bust people using unencrypted channels, esp. because people think they’re anonymous and safe. It’s much, much harder to bust people once they move to .onion sites and the real dark net away from their phone. When you shut down all the easy channels, you push people into areas where it’s much harder, almost impossible, to root them out.

      • @whereisk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        What if telegram refuses to cooperate with law enforcement in a timely fashion to provide details of the people sharing that material? What should law enforcement do then?

        • @prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          54 months ago

          At that point they’re willingly hosting it for no reason other than to host it for their customers and they’re complicit, no?

        • @HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I think that holding the executives and BoD in criminal contempt of court is a good place to start.

          EDIT: AFAIK Telegram doesn’t use warrant canaries.

        • @ravhall@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -14 months ago

          So you’re saying we should shut down any service that allows encrypted communication? Because any service that offers encrypted communication is going to be enticing to someone who commits crimes.

            • @ravhall@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              04 months ago

              We should shut down any organization that doesn’t cooperate with police when people are breaking laws or just the laws you want them to help enforce?

              • @flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                No, that’s not what the person is saying in the slightest. Just read their comment again, it’s actually very clear.

                • @ravhall@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  14 months ago

                  Creating a Telegram Channel to help underage victims of rape in Idaho get abortions out of state without their parent’s consent is also a crime. Would you want to shut them down for allowing those groups?

                  If Telegram is indeed knowledgeable of specific groups distributing CSAM, goes into that group and views the material to confirm, and still does nothing about it, then yes… that’s pretty terrible. However, it’s law enforcement’s responsibility to find those people and arrest them. If Telegram is shut down, there will always be another method. TOR, popup forums, file sharing sites like MEGA.

                  What I’m saying is focusing on the communication method is like trying to kill a hydra.

                  • @flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    14 months ago

                    Again: not what the person said. They said that if someone proves that you host CSAM, you should take it down.