• @Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    103 months ago

    As a wage slave with no bitcoin or crypto, the technology has been hijacked by these types and could otherwise have been useful.

    • @EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      I’m not entirely sold on the technology, especially since immutable ledgers have been around long before the blockchain, but also due to potential attack vectors and the natural push towards centralisation for many applications - but I’m just one man and if people find uses for it then good for them.

      • @khaleer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        I guess additional bonus for crypto would be not burning the planet, and actuallt have a real value of something, not the imagined one.

      • @eleitl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        What other solutions to double spending were there in financial cryptography before?

        • @EnderMB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          No idea, I don’t work in fintech, but was it a fundamental problem that required a solution?

          I’ve worked with blockchain in the past, and the uses where it excelled were in immutable bidding contracts for shared resources between specific owners (e.g. who uses this cable at x time).

          • @eleitl@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Fully decentralized p2p cryptocurrency transactions without double spending by proof of work (improvement upon Hashcash) was done first with Bitcoin. The term fintech did not exist at the time. EDIT: looked it up, apparently first use as Fin-Tech was 1967 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fintech – it’s not the current use of the term though.