Pretty sure they just buy the imaging from other companies, not fly their own planes. But it seems hard to confirm this. Google Earth refers to “the image provider”, which implies Google didn’t fly the planes themselves, but just bought aerial imagery which is already collected and used in other industries.
You can generally get a feel for if it’s satellite or plane images. You generally aren’t making out a cat on a deck for a satellite photo, it’s more like a blurry house and that’s all you can make out. Satellites are gonna be 100x further away when they take a photo.
Satellite imagery seems cheaper than you might think though. I’ve had SkyFi in my favourites for a while after they sponsored a YouTube video, and they seem to start at $8 per km2 for a new photo or $2.50 for a previously taken one.
Google Earth photos are mostly taken from low-altitude planes.
Huh that makes a lot more sense actually. Not sure why I never realized that.
I did wonder how they could afford so many satellites.
Pretty sure they just buy the imaging from other companies, not fly their own planes. But it seems hard to confirm this. Google Earth refers to “the image provider”, which implies Google didn’t fly the planes themselves, but just bought aerial imagery which is already collected and used in other industries.
You can generally get a feel for if it’s satellite or plane images. You generally aren’t making out a cat on a deck for a satellite photo, it’s more like a blurry house and that’s all you can make out. Satellites are gonna be 100x further away when they take a photo.
If you check at the bottom of the screen, you normally see the sources of the map data and imagery
Satellite imagery seems cheaper than you might think though. I’ve had SkyFi in my favourites for a while after they sponsored a YouTube video, and they seem to start at $8 per km2 for a new photo or $2.50 for a previously taken one.
I just figured they were in on it with the government.
Shhhhhh