According to the debate, they had their reasons. But still – when one hundred and eighty six nations say one thing, and two say another, you have to wonder about the two.

  • DacoTaco
    2•3 months ago

    I know, and i understand the difference.

    Before you read on, remember this is a view from a european guy who has known social support. I am not american, and the american way of being all on your own, with your own devices disgusts me tbh.
    Im not saying taking care of children is an investment per-se, that is a must. They need to be taken care of, period. My argument for making it sound like an investment, besides basic human need, is one created to counter those that dont believe that and think of them as a waste of time and energy.
    I see childeren in need as a hope, a potential for humanity to become better. Those that have known trouble and being poor are special, they have the potential. And yes, maybe you can see that as an investment, but please consider it an investment into humanity itself, and most certainly not an economic investment!

    What i will confess, is that this changes for me, when we are talking about adults. Things, and situations somebody is in, are very complex things as we in a world with infinite possibilities and infinite different type of people. There is like that 0.1% of human adults that would abuse the system, make it worse for everyone because they dont know or can do better in their lives. Ive grown up around such people and i consider them … Not worth it. however, those people who spoil it should not ever ruin it for the others that want it, need it. A person that can not get basic needs fulfilled should always have the option to get support. Rules can be put in place for adults, yes, but the option should be there and a person should never be put on the street with nothing.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
      2•3 months ago

      I appreciate the further clarification. I apologize if I put your example in a vacuum and projected solely that upon you. I think we’re both pretty much on the same page regarding this, so don’t really have anything more to add at this point. Cheers :)

      • DacoTaco
        1•3 months ago

        No problemo, after your comment i read my comment again and agreed it could have been interpreted in a very different way. Hence a few edits i put in hehe.

        I also had a look inside and i must admit part of me thinks of an economic investment, its an unescapable thought due to the world we live in. However, it is not even close to my real reason and drive to help people, which is hope, potential and letting the person flourish like i have been able to do!

    • Gabe BellOPEnglish
      2•3 months ago

      Ditto.

      I am also from Europe (the UK specifically) and whether someone is going to be the best person in the whole history of humanity or (for want of a better phrase) the most idle, useless wastrel known to humankind I still believe they deserve the basic support of the welfare system, and shouldn’t be left to starve to death on the streets. Because what does it say about a society that does that to someone?

      You don’t help someone for a reward, or for what you will get out of them, you help them because they are a human being who needs help.

      And if you need a better reason (because clearly some people do) you help them because if you were in that situation you hope someone would help you.

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
        2•3 months ago

        Because what does it say about a society that does that to someone?

        I just wanted to single this sentence out right here, in agreement with you. The whole purpose of living in a society is taking care of one another. Those who are able should do what they can for those who cannot. They too someday will no longer be able bodied and thus require help themselves. I feel like so many people are just so shortsighted to even see the point. It’s sad, really.