@trevwilson@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 11 months agoGlad to see Lemmy users appreciating diversitylemmy.worldimagemessage-square141fedilinkarrow-up11.45Karrow-down130
arrow-up11.42Karrow-down1imageGlad to see Lemmy users appreciating diversitylemmy.world@trevwilson@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 11 months agomessage-square141fedilink
minus-squarePyff DaddylinkfedilinkEnglish0•11 months agoIt’s far more acceptable than “blacks”. It also avoids the issue of associating general search terms for groups of people with sexualized contexts as has unfortunately been done to Asian women and others.
minus-square@Stinkywinks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink-1•11 months agoPfffffft, sounds like a load of bs. What about Brazilians?
minus-squarePyff DaddylinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-211 months agoBrazilian isn’t a race, and Black isn’t a nationality. Incredibly, it’s even possible to be both. I hope your confusion has been cleared up.
minus-square@Stinkywinks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink0•11 months agoYou said Asians. So what about Persians?
It’s far more acceptable than “blacks”. It also avoids the issue of associating general search terms for groups of people with sexualized contexts as has unfortunately been done to Asian women and others.
Pfffffft, sounds like a load of bs. What about Brazilians?
Brazilian isn’t a race, and Black isn’t a nationality. Incredibly, it’s even possible to be both. I hope your confusion has been cleared up.
You said Asians. So what about Persians?