The point is that the value would need to be default for everyone so makers needs to lower their fees. As has been said the fee/spread would have to be set the way so the users cover their cost (do not loose anything by trading) and also has some benefit out of the trade (like up to lets say 2% buffer).

Thanks, though note this:

Exolix: “Users must undergo AML/KYC procedures” source: https://kycnot.me/service/exolix

Trocador: “Trocador’s partners may require KYC checks and monitor transactions” source: https://kycnot.me/service/trocador

Official repository https://github.com/retoaccess1/haveno-reto description also mentions that new site address.

Monero does not appreciate in its price as much as mainstream cryptocurrencies so I am not holding much Monero. Rather using it occasionally to buy the hosting/server services for privacy. I can buy/sell XMR privately for fiat or BTC/ETH/LTC using RetoSwap https://github.com/retoaccess1/haveno-reto

Haveno itself is a testing version which does not allow real trading.

You need to find other software based on Haveno, which allows real trading (uses Monero mainnet servers while Haveno itself a testnet?).

Possibly most popular is Reto (RetoSwap). Its official Github repository is https://github.com/retoaccess1/haveno-reto

I am yet to find any list of Haveno mainnet software. Btw. here is some guide which explains steps for trading inside Haveno based trading software: https://internetlifeforum.com/showthread.php?28833-Exchanging-Monero-and-fiat-privately-without-KYC-using-open-source-software-Haveno

Haveno Reto mainnet official repository https://github.com/retoaccess1/haveno-reto

Haveno Pay by mail docs: https://docs.haveno.exchange/the-project/payment_methods/Pay_By_Mail/

Thanks ♥️, RBF means likely Replace By Fee which is the way to send TX again with a different fee, causing initial TX replacement. Unfortunately it looks like my Electrum BTC wallet does not have this feature (maybe because i have used “coin control” to select outputs for the payment?).

I assume that when you are linking to a Bisq page while we are talking Haveno, the Haveno is using Bisq penalties? https://docs.haveno.exchange/ does not seem to list any table of penalties.

I appreciate your replies ♥️ , it is very helpful. Thank you.

you will receive either your security deposit, or that PLUS my security deposit, or maybe even the whole trade amount

So the security deposits are in place to try to make it unprofitable to scam people in this situations.

So If I do not set a sec. deposit in my offer, then i still get mine and MAYBE your deposit, which makes it unprofitable already. Isn’t it unprofitable just because the scam attempting user has to pay the transaction fee + risking his standard (non security) deposit? (we are still talking about irreversible exchange BTC/XMR)

By managing the risk, you mean charging 25% extra (making the trade 25% more expensive for a taker), nothing else, no other way to manage the risk (i am not sure if i understand the meaning of “managing risk” as a user who never used the Haveno)? Thank you

Why actually Haveno supports trading of a reversible payment methods if anyone can chargeback after the trade is complete and there is no way to know if user scammed this or other way before?

no

Please consider clarifying what do you mean by changing identity for the business.

Full-Chain Membership Proofs (FCMP), as a concept, is a replacement for rings within the Monero protocol. … This means every input goes from an immediate anonymity set of 16 to 100,000,000.

https://ccs.getmonero.org/proposals/fcmp++-development.html shows “Completed 0 of 7 milestones” at my end.

Reminded me Lucy Lawless (Xena) :)

I think that what helped was to remove “END;” line. It’s an alias for COMMIT.

Quoting from https://docs.featherwallet.org/guides/nodes

However, a malicious remote node can:

• execute an attack that may reveal the true input of a transaction. This attack does not reveal how much is spent or to whom. This attack has a low chance of succeeding and Feather will warn you if it detects this attack.
• make your outgoing transactions stick out by manipulating the transaction fee that you pay.
• associate your outgoing transactions with your IP address (but only if all traffic is routed through clearnet, see Tor support for more information. By default, transactions are broadcast over Tor.)

If you have an insight/feedback on this, please comment.

Ok, so spending received XMR within 15 blocks (block time seems to be 2 minutes, so half a hour) is too early and spending every 6 months incoming payments in one single tx to my secondary wallet i suppose is too long time… hmm, that is all quite complicated, I can’t asses/compare these times (30 minutes vs 1 month vs 6 months) significance of the impact on anonymity. But thank you.

I will need to consolidate/sweep hundreds of transactions maybe once per year and pay it to someone in one big transaction. This big transaction is mandatory, i can not pay them in small amounts. The plan on how to proceed is already mentioned below when you search for “C)” on this page. Please if it is wrong or if you have an improvement idea (anonymity-wise), comment on that below. Thank you

Thx, I have found that the small to medium Lemmy instances are NOT aware about the post, yet most of big instances are. So it fits what has been said: “New posts and comments should always propagate if at least one user is subscribed to the community.” - big instances and old instances has higher likelyhood of someone being subscibed to it prior to me posting the post, so the instance could download that post. Related topic: What are the conditions for the Lemmy post to be distributed to other Lemmy instances?