I can? I was under the impression I had to download them once before reviewing them.

I don’t get my Lemmy apps from a store like the Play Store, but if I did I would absolutely leave a review. I only get them from Github with Obtainium.

Late reply but I’ll give my input. This is probably a controversial one but I don’t think we should allow AI in this community or in !196@pawb.social. Maybe people might think that’s weird since I run an AI community on dbzer0 but AI generated content has a specific time and place I don’t think this community is one of them. If there is demand for AI memes I think there should simply be a dedicated community for it and if people don’t like it they can block that one.

That said I don’t agree with the hostility I’ve seen towards others in this community over use of AI (intentional or not) and trying to defame or harass them. This is disgusting and inexcusable.

One thing I do worry about when policing AI content is that this is a reposting community and people posting AI content on accident is almost guaranteed. For that reason I think that we need to be careful with how it’s enforced and also how people behave around it. The flaming, harassment, and defamation that has been a typical response is unacceptable.

I forgot that the really bad stuff gets scrubbed even from the modlog…

It’s more like, if it gets removed by “ban with content removal” it never gets announced. Entries can’t really be removed from the modlog when they appear, at least not on all instances at once. It’s actually an unintended bug which will probably be fixed in 1.0 since as of now you can’t even tell comments were removed if someone bans a person with content removal.

I just noticed a lil lizard on the wall in the background, cute.

Also yeah don’t pour oil down the drain it can cause clogs and it can ruin your pipes, especially if it’s hot.

Agreed, the PBS channels are great. SciShow too, I’m not sure if that’s PBS owned or if it’s independent.

I’m definitely down.

Like many people are saying that’s 2.6W per core. Which is actually very good.

My laptop is running an Intel CPU with a TDP of 45W, which doesn’t seem as bad as that one until you realize that it’s only 6 cores meaning it uses 7.5W per core. If we multiply by the number of cores this CPU has we get 1440W if it were as inefficient as my Intel CPU, and that’s a very conservative estimate which assumes my CPU is as efficient as intel claims the Intel Core i7-9750H is, it actually might be much worse considering how hot this laptop gets, especially when gaming (though I don’t game on this laptop anymore for that reason).

Bottom line, this is a very efficient CPU, but it’s also an insanely ovepowered CPU that most people will not use or need. Only datacenters and extremely dedicated power users need a CPU anywhere near this powerful.

See if you can see it on your dbzer0 account now. I just added you as a mod to the modeveryone community.

That’s weird, maybe a bug or maybe it requires you to be a mod to see it?

I mean you can report multiple comments, but as I said in my other comment about that unless you reported like 50 comments (common sense says that reporting multiple comments in a discussion thread wouldn’t be anywhere near report abuse thresholds) it would be PTB to ban someone for reporting multiple comments in a discussion. You want people to report violating content and not be worried about action for that, sometimes violating content spans multiple comments at once.

Nope Tesseract shows the mod who did it when you’re logged in to the instance you’re viewing it from. I believe some apps also show the mod names as well, I know Photon and Voyager do.

Yeah I agree, @nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com OP a governance post is probably the best thing to do about this, it’ll bring the most clarity here, especially since this case is about the instance itself.

Just FYI you can’t report someone more than once, you can report multiple of their comments but no comment more than once. It would be stupid and PTB to punish someone for reporting multiple of their comments, as it is beneficial to point out violating content. Maybe if he reported a hundred comments sure but two, three, or seven is not reasonably report abuse.

I think a better way would be to just ask the db0 admins since they can see all the reports that went down.

@db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com @Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com Maybe you could provide the exact copies of the reports made by @nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com, obscuring the resolver if necessary (though since I can see who banned him in t.lemmy.dbzer0.com I’m not sure how much privacy that would give).

Lemmy reports can only go through once, you can’t report someone multiple times unless you use multiple accounts.

I agree, really wish lemmy had a native warning function built-in that sent a message to the modlog and an anonymous mod message to the user they can’t reply to which warned them of their action. Mastodon has a warning function natively, why doesn’t Lemmy?

.ml as usual trying to justify anything they dislike as bigotry or sexism. Should probably also post about this on !meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works

It is very delightful news for everyone who isn’t on there, both because the hate-filled site is down and also because its most prolific users are scared as hell and might very well face consequences due to being unmasked.

They look very similar to Smaug.