It really depends.

Merely saying that the administration needs to be guillotined isn’t illegal because its protected by the Constitution’s First Amendment.

However, such rhetoric loses such protection when it starts to manifest a particularity. So, saying “Guillotine Republicans because they fucking deserve it” is protected. Statements like “Guillotine Republican X at his address Y at Z p.m.” is not.

Is that the one where they still rot in hell but they get cookies from time to time?

Had to translate that, but I think what you said was funny.

Whats with the third guy from the left at the top handing off knives to babies?

They even carry the mark of the beast upon their brow (MAGA hats).

Trump wants a holy american empire.

No, his backers want a holy American empire. Trump is an opportunist merely looking for self enrichment.

An absurdity of what the Pope being tough on crime would look like. Dressing up as batman and punching bad guys? An absurd level of toughness on crime.

But for the pontius pilate stuff, the whole crucifixion came about as an execution for the crime ginned up by the Sanhedrin (a Jewish judicial body).

Dividing up the clothing by lots is such an abomination.

Well the “that” could be that the friend’s comment was that the image was insulting to Catholics, or the “that” could be referring to the specific reaction. It basically needed some better comma usage because there is a difference between:

His reaction was, that the image was, insulting to the Catholic religion and blasphemous.

and

His reaction was that, the image, was insulting to the Catholic religion and blasphemous.

I guess the vagueness comes from the double “was” usage.

His reaction was that the image was insulting to the Catholic religion and blasphemous.

You friend’s reaction to the image was insulting and blasphemous? Or, was his reaction to the image itself was insulting and blasphemous?

Jesus flipped nicer tables than this.

Hard to do that after Trump 1, a respite from Biden, and then choosing Trump 2.

Okay internet. The first hero was meme’d into this guy:

Since this second hero has facial hair, I think we should keep with the theme and meme him into this guy:

Let’s make it happen internet denizens.

It depends on the loan. A regular loan will probably end, but a student loan isn’t even dischargable by the heat death of the universe. It even said so in paragraph 32.3(A)(18)[c] of the loan documents.