• antidote101@lemmy.world
    24·
    11 个月前

    Gaming on low resolution because the game is premised on low poly fun, not high end graphics covering for mediocre gameplay.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    18·
    11 个月前

    • Gaming on lower resolution because electricity prices are high.

    • Gaming on lower resolution because it removes obstacles and gives a tactical advantage.

    • CucumberFetish@lemm.eeOP
      16·
      11 个月前
      • Gaming on a new GPU because it’s faster
      • Gaming on an old GPU because it’s VRAM is dying and sometimes the walls disappear
  • sploosh@lemmy.world
    13·
    11 个月前

    My 7800xt pulls about 230 watts at full bore, giving me my monitor’s refresh rate in FPS, 144. Limiting the framerate to 72 results in no tearing and drops the GPU watts to 170. Worth it.

        • sploosh@lemmy.world
          6·
          11 个月前

          Longevity. I build a computer once every 6-10 years and don’t do much upgrading in between. Buying a beefier GPU means it’ll play new games well for a good long while.

          And it’s not like I’m doing this all the time. I was curious about the power usage, so I made a script to monitor it and starting tinkering with settings to see what the delta would be. I’m a 100% ultra, max resolution 95% of the time.

        • dlok@lemmy.world
          1·
          11 个月前

          I’m just thinking of using what I already have… I also suspect there is an efficiency sweet spot than running at full capacity

          • Miss Brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            1·
            11 个月前

            Oh, absolutely. The higher-end you go, the more the product is tuned for balls to the walls power with no consideration for efficiency.

            As the extreme example, the 4090 can deliver almost 94% of it’s full potential when limiting its power draw to about 70% and/or undervolting it.

            (Not exactly sure about the numbers, but you get the idea)

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    11·
    11 个月前

    Retro gaming… Low res… CRT filter with the warped edges and blooooooom effects… this is the ideal way to play your SNES games. Try it with Super Metroid, that shit is straight up unnerving and beautiful.

  • Smorty [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    10·
    11 个月前

    I have a Watt-Meter right on my PC plug next to my monitor so I can always see how much I consume. It’s crazy how much the monitors alone take up, it’s kind 40 KW/h each. I’m considering removing one of them.

      • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
        7·
        11 个月前

        Neither hopefully. The former at least is a unit of power, but 40 kW is enough to heat up a whole apartment building.

        In reality a large and older monitor might use a couple hundred watts. A small modern 24" will probably use closer to 50 W (guesstimating), which is still a decent chunk of the power draw of a budget build.

    • sploosh@lemmy.world
      2·
      11 个月前

      KW/h is a measure of total energy, not instantaneous power. Your watt meter was saying that since last reset of the value it measured 40 KW/h of energy use. That’s not an insignificant amount - a Chevy Bolt can go around 180 miles on 40KW/h. Watts, or kilowatts, are instantaneous power. That same Bolt can easily pull 100KW while accelerating and if it could somehow do that for an hour, it would have used 100KW/h. It could never make it the whole hour as it has a 65KW/h battery, so it would run out after 39 minutes.

      • bob_lemon@feddit.de
        4·
        11 个月前

        What you’re describing is kWh, not kW/h. You need to multiply power with time to get back to energy. An appliance using 1kW of power for 1h “uses” 1kWh of energy. The same appliance running for 2h requires 2kWh instead.

        kW/h doesn’t really make sense as a unit, although it could technically describe the rate at which energy consumption changes over time.

    • saigot@lemmy.ca
      1·
      11 个月前

      A typical wall outlet can only draw 1800w (1.8kw) no way is it drawing 40kwh (kw/h is a nonsense unit in this context). If it’s drawing 40wh ghats actually quite low, a typical monitor is closer to 80-100w while powered on.

      Where I live electricity is about 10c/kwh (cheap I know) so a 100w monitor is costing me about a cent an hour. More than worth it imo but you make your own decisions.

  • Hootz@lemmy.ca
    10·
    11 个月前

    This is why I do love that my PC is powered by renewable energy. It blows my mind how expensive power is everywhere else, plus I don’t wanna game if it means I gotta roll coal like huge parts of the world.

  • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
    8·
    11 个月前

    I game on lower resolution because a lot of modern games are too hyper detailed for me and I get lost in the crisp information density. That and I hate the sound of computer fans

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      6·
      11 个月前

      I get lost in the crisp information density.

      Man you’re gonna hate this thing called the real world. I hear the pixels are mere nanometers across

      • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
        3·
        11 个月前

        That’s the crisp part. A lot of modern games seem to be obsessed with making every single pixel pop out at you. Rummaging around outside is not like that it’s softer. A real world comparison would be something like malls which are obsessed with making every inch of visible space distinctly pop. I also hate being in malls

    • VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world
      3·
      11 个月前

      I’ve been replaying FFXIV recently and I had the game running at the maximum refresh rate of my monitor and it was making the fans run harder. it took me way too long to realise that I should just go a setting down for refresh rate instead of altering fan speeds.

    • CucumberFetish@lemm.eeOP
      2·
      11 个月前
      • Buying Noctua NH-D15 because it keeps the CPU the coolest
      • Buying 360mm AIO because it is the most silent
  • Miss Brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    5·
    11 个月前

    But seriously though, I cut off a good 30-40% from my GPUs power limit and would you look at that, I still enjoy the games I play.

    Have to run most of them at low to medium settings anyway, so might as well.

    Only thing left to improve it further would be undervolting, I should try that at some point.

    • CucumberFetish@lemm.eeOP
      2·
      11 个月前

      Undervolt it too. Depending on what GPU you have, you might drop an additional 20-40% without a performance hit. An older GTX1070 I used to have dropped power consumption by 40%. The energy savings weren’t that big, but it was nice and quiet