Climate change is making severe storms both more common and more intense.
First the river rose in Texas. Then, the rains fell hard over North Carolina, New Mexico and Illinois.
In less than a week, there were at least four 1-in-1,000-year rainfall events across the United States — intense deluges that are thought to have roughly a 0.1% chance of happening in any given year.
“Any one of these intense rainfall events has a low chance of occurring in a given year,” said Kristina Dahl, vice president for science at the nonprofit organization Climate Central, “so to see events that are historic and record-breaking in multiple parts of the country over the course of one week is even more alarming.”
It’s the kind of statistic, several experts said, that is both eye-opening and likely to become more common because of climate change.
By definition those are not 1-in-1000. They were, but no longer.
Considering I’m already on my fifth “once in a lifetime” economic collapse I’m not surprised.
There are no storms in Bah Sing Se.
God is angry at the Republican, red states for electing Trump.
And people still won’t take accountability for their contributions to climate change. SMH
“Drill, baby, drill”
The stupid fucks had every chance to build a flood alert system. They refused because they did not want to be bought by the Democrats. Well, the dumb bastards fucking found out and they will not learn.
Well yeah… the anti-christ has risen to power.
Trump: See how it is? Even the best storms are in the USA now! Make Rains Great Again. Glory to the beautiful me!
Bullshit. Trump will blame this on Democrats.
Kamala Harris as seen by MAGAts:
He already was blaming the Texas floods on Biden. The all powerful Biden, causing all kinds of trouble 7 months after he left office. Trump wishes he had power like that.
Unfortunately he does. The aftermath of this regime will take a minimum of 50 years to fix, if it can be.
Marjorie Trailerpark Greene is literally advancing a bill to ban chemtrails.
A thing that does not exist nor happen at any kind of scale whatsoever, beyond very, very limited and occasional scientific tests… decades ago, and were funded via programs and grants the Big Bullshit Bill and other Trump EOs have decimated.
They do, literally, unironically, blame made up, magic, conspiracy nonsense instead of even attempting to agree with the vast, vast, vaaaaast majority of climate scientists, and even corpo scientists that work for fossil fuel companies that broadly predicted all this would happen roughly 30 years before public science caught up with it (thanks to the lobbying and propoganda campaigns of the same fossil fuel corps.)
They will do literally anything other than admit that they are wrong, their understanding of the world is objectively delusional.
They’re too good at magic sky daddy logic.
Anyone remember this classic line from Trump 1.0 about hurricane Florence?
This is a tough hurricane, one of the wettest we’ve ever seen from the standpoint of water
Lets hope he doesn’t nuke the next one.
https://www.axios.com/2019/08/25/trump-nuclear-bombs-hurricanes
This is gonna create some real bad problems for building codes. Lots of stuff is designed with statistical probabilities in mind, where they account for varying levels of rare extreme weather events. If the 1 in 100 years storm becomes a 1 in 10 years storm, then lots of stuff will be in trouble.
lots of stuff will be in trouble.
Like, civilization?
Depends on where you live and how smart the people there were about planning for climate change. Residential houses are probably not the biggest issues. Its the more extreme constructs like skyscrapers and bridges that might be in trouble sooner than that.
Or you know, the global supply chain and food systems. Breadbaskets will need to function throughout all this.
Yeah ofcourse, there are going to be problems in every aspect of our lives. I was just specifically thinking about this statistical thing that is used for building safety considerations during construction.
Uh yeah, actuaries have already determined the world GDP will be catastrophically damaged, forever, if we don’t limit warming to 2C.
We already blew past 1.5C, if you didn’t know… and also, the trend in the last decade is continuously that the climate is breaking harder and faster than the scientific consensus broadly projects… so its probably gonna be actually worse than this.
…
US insurance companies have already figured out that roughly the bottom 1/3 of the US will be uninsurable in 10 years… which is why they’re either massively upping insurance rates, or largely pulling out of the home insurance business in CA, FL, other southern US states and regions, which is causing all these states to bankrupt themselves as they try to offer a public/government version of home insurance, but refuse to tax people appropriately or fairly to be able to actuslly fund such an endeavor.
Generally, you can’t get a home mortgage without insurance, you can’t own and rent a place out if you don’t have property insurance.
…
tl;dr: You have no idea how fucked we all are.
it’s okay the trump fascists will dismantle NOAA and then we won’t know any of this anymore :3
I remember when 1.5C was the threshold instead of 2. We’re already living in yesterday’s doomsday scenario.
florida is pretty much a given, building in flood prone areas is just asking for it.
Generally, you can’t get a home mortgage without insurance, you can’t own and rent a place out if you don’t have property insurance.
So, Canada, then?
I am unironically moving to Minnesota ASAP.
Cheapest to live in decently blue state, all the climate risk assesments I’ve seen seem to show that, as long as you’re not living right on the Mississippi, pretty low comparative climate risks… oh, and their housing market (thus economy generally) is fairly stable, compared to about half of the rest of the country, whose housing market is currently crashing harder than the 06-08 GFC.
Canada isn’t a bad option at all, but its actually fairly difficult to legally migrate there.
Its gonna be really, really funny when the Canadians start deporting waves of poor Americans fleeing northward, in about 5 to 10 years.
…ye gads, just imagine how bad the mosquito clouds are going to get…
Fun fact, the reason we all call it “climate change” and not “global warming” was because the George W Bush administration directed NASA to do so, as they deemed it less “scary” to the public:
In interviews, Republican politicians and their aides said they agreed with the strategist, Frank Luntz, that it was important to pay attention to what his memorandum, written before the November elections, called ‘‘the environmental communications battle.’’
In his memorandum, Mr. Luntz urges that the term ‘‘climate change’’ be used instead of ‘‘global warming,’’ because ‘‘while global warming has catastrophic communications attached to it, climate change sounds a more controllable and less emotional challenge.’’
Also, he wrote, ‘‘conservationist’’ conveys a ‘‘moderate, reasoned, common sense position’’ while ‘‘environmentalist’’ has the ‘‘connotation of extremism.’’
President Bush’s speeches on the environment show that the terms ‘‘global warming’’ and ‘‘environmentalist’’ had largely disappeared by late last summer. The terms appeared in a number of President Bush’s speeches in 2001, but now the White House fairly consistently uses ‘‘climate change’’ and ‘‘conservationist.’’
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/02/us/a-call-for-softer-greener-language.html
What drives me insane is how everyone on the left just… went along with it. Now we retroactively rewrite history and claim that they were always separate terms with entirely different distinct meanings. And knowing that so many highly educated, inquisitive, independent thinking people didn’t think to question that or look into that, it frightens me.
While the Bush administration certainly had (very obviou$) reasons for trying to downplay it, I also remember at least some scientists at the time arguing that climate change was a better term because people are particularly stupid about the term global warming when it paradoxically results in some places having a greater number of and more extreme cold events.
Ex: every time some dumbfuck Republican brought a snowball into Congress to talk about how global warming is fake because look here’s snow!!
I also remember at least some scientists at the time arguing that climate change was a better term because people are particularly stupid about the term global warming when it paradoxically results in some places having a greater number of and more extreme cold events.
That’s how I recall the term climate change coming into favor, too.
God, I wish it only happened once.
That snowball guy finally died last year, thank God. Too bad it wasn’t from a flood or hurricane.
The left went along with it because they were tired of all the “then why is it so cold in winter?” comments from the stupid half of the family tree.
We still get that now. As if cold things can’t exist when it’s hotter.
Good to know! They should have been a little more creative and called it something familiar and snappy like Sport Utility Environment or Gas Guzzler.
deleted by creator
They’re not “1 in a thousand years” anymore!
They’re once a week!
4 times a week now!
So remember that tipping point we were warned about? Yeah, its happening. The deep ocean currents in the southern ocean have reversed.. TLDR: warmer saltier carbon dioxide rich water is now coming up from the deep ocean instead of being trapped there. It is melting sea-ice from below and could eventually lead to the reversal or stagnation of other ocean currents.
Even better, this occurred about a decade ago, and we didn’t even realize it untill now… meaning the global thermohaline circulation cycle has been collapsing for a decade.
Oops.
Irreversible. Can’t fix.
No going back.
In all likelihood, we have Great Filtered ourselves.
Best case scenario, we get a century or so, starting basically now, of civilization collapse, mass famine and death, attempts at mass migrations that mostly get Holocausted, and of course wars, potentially nuclear wars…
…and then maybe in 100 years the remaining human population of roughly 1-2 billion can maybe figure out a new paradigm… if we have not just permanently broken the biosphere, and already extracted all the easily extractable natural resources.
My money is on nuclear self-destruction. We have way too many of these things in the hands of extremely poor leadership. It really feels like it’s just a matter of time.
… I have a graphic for that, if you’re in the US.
“I don’t want to set the world… on… fire…”
we probably die from drought long before that happens, or if one of the supervolcanoe erupts
Cascadia Subduction Zone super-earthquake.
Imagine an 8.5 to 10 mag earthquake, but instead of at one localized point, its basically continuous along about 500 to 1000 miles of a line about 250 miles out in in the Pacific, where one tectonic plate is diving under others, but has been building up friction tension for ~300 years.
And it normally snaps roughly every 250 years, the last time it happened it caused a tsunami that hit Japan, and is the origin of many PNW Native People’s flood stories.
So we’re ~50 years overdue for that happening again.
When I was a kid, they said it was a 1 in 20 chance happening in this century. Now they say its a 1 in 3 chance.
After this process is over, after everything gets shaken to all hell, and tsunami’d… well, in many areas, the coastal plates actually end up something like 10 to 15 feet lower than it was previously…
So those areas are now just permanently flooded, now under the new default water line.
And if we are all super duper unlucky, this massive of an event could trigger other fault lines along the NA West Coast, in say, California…
… and the Cascade mountain range…
… yeah a lot of them are actually volcanoes, which were formed by this very same plate dynamic that would be snapping in a CSZ rupture… they have just been dormant for a long time… they could potentially become more active or even erupt.
So yeah, that would/could basically destroy most of civilization roughly west of I5, on the West Coast.
yellowstone supervolcanoe, the cascadia landslides might cause a mega tsunami though.
Yep. SMOC reversed.
We. Are. Fucked.
Sooner or later the AMOC will start to be affected as well
Some are unironically already saying it’s evil liberal cloud seeding.
That and HAARP directed energy weapon
Reply that it’s God punishing the nation for electing a pedophile president.
Some are already doing violence about it.
We tried to warn them.
Ignorance is bad. Willful ignorance is deadly.
