• Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    Reducing dependence on crackpot America is good in my book, as long as we’re not going to just spend that budget with them anyway.

    But for gods sake get rid of the tax exemption on wealth to pay for it instead of cutting things that people actually need.

  • SleafordMod@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think the 3% target is intended for the next parliament though. The target he wants to hit in this parliament is 2.5% from 2027 onwards.

    I guess raising defence spending makes sense so that the UK can better protect itself from threats like Russia.

    • shoulderoforion@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      … and the United States. These tiered increases aren’t going to do much at all in the short term. UK does have nukes which protect it’s borders, but it’s not going to do anything for mainland Europe.

      • SleafordMod@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Apparently France may use its nukes to protect Europe, according to The Telegraph (whether they’re right, I don’t know). Maybe Europe together should develop a joint nuclear weapons program. Then British nukes wouldn’t have to depend on US missiles anymore.

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    The prime minister, in an unexpected statement in parliament, announced spending would be increased to 2.5% of the UK’s GDP by 2027.

    He also announced the government would cut back on foreign aid, reducing current spending from 0.5% of GDP to 0.3%.

    Bit depressing that they can find the cash for weapons.

    • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Bit depressing that they can find the cash for weapo

      Defence increase (by 2027) is entirly funded by aid reduction.

      So seems that was the only way to fund it.

      • Mr Poletski@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        to be fair, having a better funded and equipped military gives us the ability for more ‘foreign action’ which could be used in place of ‘aid’ in certain circumstances.

        • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Def a better manned military dose. Well-trained disaplined manpower can be the most helpful aid to many a crisis.

          Unfortunately, equipped depends very much on the type of equipment. With the modern military, less spending goes on such equipment. As more effort is made to move personnel from the field. IE remote combat.

      • gnutrino@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        “Your government spends more per capita on healthcare through Medicare, Medicaid and government employee insurance than any country with universal healthcare” ~ the rest of the world