More money in the pockets of entry-level workers sounds great, but Rachel Greszler of the conservative Heritage Foundation argues that such workers, and the economy writ large, are hurt more than helped by increases in the minimum wage.
Hahahaha you can’t even be bothered to send an actual relevant link, or recite your actual problems with the sources because there is no problem, you just don’t like them.
You’re so bad at this you’re single-handedly proving why we need a better education system in this country, because you’re so confidently incorrect it’s obvious you don’t even know how to have a good faith discussion with someone.
You can’t just throw away a source because you don’t like the information and won’t read it. That just makes you stubborn and ill-informed. 🤣
I’m not your mom. You want a bedtime story? Go read it yourself.
Hahahaha you can’t even be bothered to send an actual relevant link, or recite your actual problems with the sources because there is no problem, you just don’t like them
I see my point of linking to Wikipedia.org went right over your head, I should have expected that.
You can’t just throw away a source because you don’t like the information and won’t read it. That just makes you stubborn and ill-informed. 🤣
I did read it and there’s nothing showing FDR supporting a $0.40 rate and it being opposed for the $0.40 rate, there were a whole host of other reasons but not the rate.
I’m not your mom. You want a bedtime story? Go read it yourself.
I see you’re back to claiming you have evidence but refuse to provide it because … reasons. It’s so strange that this constantly happens to you, it’s almost like you’re full of shit and can’t back it up.
Oh Jesus. Now you’re using your own second goalpost move as gospel so your original statement that the minimum wage was not intended to be a living wage won’t be wrong.
Your messages are 99% projection, Jimbo. I’m starting to think you legitimately aren’t aware.
Hahahaha you can’t even be bothered to send an actual relevant link, or recite your actual problems with the sources because there is no problem, you just don’t like them.
You’re so bad at this you’re single-handedly proving why we need a better education system in this country, because you’re so confidently incorrect it’s obvious you don’t even know how to have a good faith discussion with someone.
You can’t just throw away a source because you don’t like the information and won’t read it. That just makes you stubborn and ill-informed. 🤣
I’m not your mom. You want a bedtime story? Go read it yourself.
I see my point of linking to Wikipedia.org went right over your head, I should have expected that.
I did read it and there’s nothing showing FDR supporting a $0.40 rate and it being opposed for the $0.40 rate, there were a whole host of other reasons but not the rate.
I see you’re back to claiming you have evidence but refuse to provide it because … reasons. It’s so strange that this constantly happens to you, it’s almost like you’re full of shit and can’t back it up.
Oh Jesus. Now you’re using your own second goalpost move as gospel so your original statement that the minimum wage was not intended to be a living wage won’t be wrong.
Your messages are 99% projection, Jimbo. I’m starting to think you legitimately aren’t aware.
Yet another excuse not to provide the information, just post it all ready.
lol dude just take the L and move on with your life, this is getting sad.
Still won’t post it, it’s clear you don’t have anything.
I posted, you didn’t like. It’s clear you just don’t want to be wrong.
You posted a link not the content you claim proves your point. I in similar fashion posted a link to Wikipedia which I claim proves my point.
Sorry pal, this just further proves you’re not here to have a rational discussion.
The more you reply the sadder you look.