• I don’t even understand what they’re asking for here? Are they suggesting that the Supreme Court can overturn a state conviction? I didn’t think that was allowed, but if any court is corrupt enough to do it I suppose it’s this one.

    • @dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      285 months ago

      The SC is allowed to weigh in on a State matter, but its only supposed to happen when it concerns something that the Federal Government has a say in, or a matter that includes a dispute between states. However, the SC itself if the sole arbiter of whether it reaches that threshold or not, so who knows what excuse they might pull out of Harlan Crow’s jet.

      One thing that is certain, however, is that it cannot act at all until all appeals in NY are exhausted. So that means the SC can’t just zoom in and grab the case unless his appeals first get turned down by all courts through the highest appellate court in NY. Then his lawyers can ask the SC as a last resort, and we’ll see where that leads.

      • @Dkarma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        15 months ago

        You can thank Jack Smith for setting that “can’t skip” precedent not too long ago… 😂

    • @walter_wiggles@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      245 months ago

      They’ll do it, then it’ll be contested, and go to court. It will be appealed up to the SC where they’ll decide it’s allowed.

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      55 months ago

      So, you’re not going to want to hear this but SCOTUS is the court you appeal to after you lose at your state supreme court. SCOTUS rarely takes the case and even more rarely sides with the convicted person. If they vacate Trump’s conviction it would be incredibly hypocritical considering their treatment of other people with real problems with their convictions.