• @Maalus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -116 months ago

    How the fuck is calling for suffering of someone else upvoted? You people got so far into tribalism bullshit you don’t see them as actual humans anymore

    • Hanrahan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      226 months ago

      I can speak for the OP but schadenfreude ia a thing, that aside speaking for mysel, I’m certinaly indifferent as I would be if a drunk driver crashed and complained about the car repairs, the inconvenience of not having a vehicle and the sore ribs. You were fucking drunk driving you shitty human being!

      I’m also mindful of Karl Poppers “Tolerance of Intolerance,” if you tolerate these shit stains, you end up with civilisations collapse and an unlivable world. So while not agreeing with the person you responded to I can certinaly understand it. Theyre doing very real damage to other humans; women, minorities etc and intent on destroying the biosphere. They are literally and proudly the bad guys.

      • @Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        -196 months ago

        No, this isn’t “car driver crashes into a tree, complains about repairs”. This is “people with a different political opinion are suffering, yaaaaaay!”

        No. Again, this has nothing to do with tolerance. This is 100% tribalism and “lesser man” philosophy. You can disagree with someone and not be celebrating when they get heatstroke, it’s basic empathy

        • @spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          176 months ago

          This isn’t a “different political opinion”. Climate change isn’t an opinion, period. A different political opinion is supposed to mean a different policy solution to a specific problem, not wholesale ignoring reality.

              • @Maalus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                -56 months ago

                Ah yes “they deserved it, good” = Shadenfreude, not totally being an asshole without empathy. Time to go to a local oncology center and shadefreude conservatives with cancer, huh?

                • You need to learn about nuance. Thanks for letting us know that shadenfreude is bad, karma is bad, fuck around and find out is also bad, do stupid stuff and win stupid prizes is bad, irony, also bad, leopards eating faces, beleive it or not, bad. Let’s all pour one out for aggressive drivers getting speeding tickets, all the bullies out there who got punched back, and anytime justice is a served while we’re at it. If someone displays any emotion besides unbridled empathy for adults inflicting misery on themselves in all situation, bad!

                  • @Maalus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -36 months ago

                    Way to go with the slippery slope fallacy huh, buddy. First of all - you shouldn’t feel satisfaction when someone gets hurt. No matter if they are speeding, if they were overeating or if they smoked.

                    Let’s also not call this “any emotion”. This is “feeling satisfaction because of others surffering”.

        • @DarthFrodo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          146 months ago

          This is “people with a different political opinion are suffering, yaaaaaay!”

          To be fair, the issue isn’t that they have “a different political opinion”, the issue is that they will cause insane amounts of suffering and deaths down the line if they get their way. Climate change will kill millions of people, and trump and his supporters seek to make it even worse for short term political gain (aside from the attempts to install an authoritarian dictatorship and all that stuff).

          That being said, I’m also not happy when indoctrinated people suffer, regardless of their murderous ideologies. Imo it’s more of a cultural issue, and nobody has any direct control over the culture/social environment that they grow up in.

          • @YeetPics@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            -116 months ago

            So the only thing stopping you from celebrating the suffering of other people is how closely their political opinions are to yours, and if you feel they’ve acted with negligence in their political support?

            Can you explain how this is not a tribal vendetta?

            • @nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              126 months ago

              These people are causing their own suffering and contributing to that of many many others. Your instinct to boil this down to “political opinions” shows your own bias - since you can’t defend the position itself you must reduce it to “just an opinion”. Anthropogenic climate change is not a political opinion, it’s a real thing that is happening in reality.

            • @DarthFrodo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              8
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Read the second paragraph again. I explicitly said that I’m not happy about their suffering, regardless of their political opinions.

              It’s just disingenuous to claim that people merely take issue with their opinions when it’s the actions that are the real problem, although that still doesn’t justify schadenfreude.

        • @Daxtron2@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          86 months ago

          Getting a small satisfaction from people getting heat stroke due to their own horrible choices is not the same as wanting to kill all queer, immigrant, and brown people but nice try.

          • @Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -46 months ago

            Ah yes, the “small tiny tiny satisfaction” and the other side is “wanting to kill everybody”. Don’t you see how hypocritical this is? It’s literally tribalism to the max, excusing “your own” side and making a fuss about “the others”.