downpunxx to Technology@lemmy.world • 8 months agoThe diagnosis is in—bad memory knocked NASA’s aging Voyager 1 offlinearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1384arrow-down13file-textcross-posted to: space@beehaw.orgscience@lemmy.world
arrow-up1381arrow-down1external-linkThe diagnosis is in—bad memory knocked NASA’s aging Voyager 1 offlinearstechnica.comdownpunxx to Technology@lemmy.world • 8 months agomessage-square39fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: space@beehaw.orgscience@lemmy.world
minus-squareEndorkendlinkfedilink58•8 months agoThis is just a diagnosis of the problem. That thing is engineered so they can bypass or repurpose ever little bit. Which is probably what they’ll do now, do a software update that will make the system evade the bad memory segment. Voyager has 3 computers and only 1 is affected.
minus-square@NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-28 months agoDid they use 3 different types of memory? If one is failing after 45 years I’d think the odds of the other similar memory possibly failing as well is possible
This is just a diagnosis of the problem.
That thing is engineered so they can bypass or repurpose ever little bit.
Which is probably what they’ll do now, do a software update that will make the system evade the bad memory segment.
Voyager has 3 computers and only 1 is affected.
Did they use 3 different types of memory? If one is failing after 45 years I’d think the odds of the other similar memory possibly failing as well is possible