@catculation@lemmy.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 8 months agoASCII art elicits harmful responses from 5 major AI chatbotsarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1261arrow-down16cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.worldascii_art@lemmy.world
arrow-up1255arrow-down1external-linkASCII art elicits harmful responses from 5 major AI chatbotsarstechnica.com@catculation@lemmy.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 8 months agomessage-square35fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.worldascii_art@lemmy.world
minus-square@pufferfischerpulver@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglish16•8 months agoTrue, but people generally understand hammers. Llms? Not so much
minus-square@ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish4•8 months agoNo one’s going after computer manufacturers or OS vendors because people use computers to commit cybercrime. I doubt most people could explain how an OS or motherboard works.
minus-square@Akrenion@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglish9•8 months agoA lot of poluticians want hardwarelevel backdoors. It’s been declared unconstitutional quite some times in different countries but they are trying.
minus-square@WallEx@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglish1•8 months agoThat would be soooo bad, almost as bad as making a law against encryption
True, but people generally understand hammers. Llms? Not so much
No one’s going after computer manufacturers or OS vendors because people use computers to commit cybercrime. I doubt most people could explain how an OS or motherboard works.
A lot of poluticians want hardwarelevel backdoors. It’s been declared unconstitutional quite some times in different countries but they are trying.
That would be soooo bad, almost as bad as making a law against encryption