• @threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    64 months ago

    You do realize these “commercial companies” such as SpaceX are funded by government contracts right?

    Yes, but it will be cheaper for NASA to outsource cargo and crew transport than if they did everything themselves. Just look at the success of the NASA’s Commercial Resupply Services and Commercial Crew programs. Cygnus, Dragon, and Falcon 9 are way cheaper than Orion and Ares I would have been for low earth orbit.

    This leaves NASA with more resources to devote towards interesting science and exploration missions. I don’t see why lunar exploration would be any different.

    • Yes, but it will be cheaper for NASA to outsource cargo and crew transport than if they did everything themselves.

      That is absolutely wrong. Commercialization in the space sector is - without exception - ALWAYS more expensive in the long run. Not only do you have inefficient company structures much like the public sector administration, you now also have to finance the insane profit margins of some egomaniacs like the little rat that runs shitter these days.

    • Tar_Alcaran
      link
      fedilink
      44 months ago

      This argument gets made a lot when talking about privatisation. Lots basic and essential services have gotten privatised over we decades, and none of them got better or cheaper.

      The only way you can benefit from privatizing something is when you make others pay for it. In this case, SpaceX is burning other people’s venture capital like rocketfuel. I prefer that over spending public money, but unfortunately, they’ve also spent 1.9billion on a moon lander, with nothing to show.

      • @threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago

        Lots basic and essential services have gotten privatised over we decades, and none of them got better or cheaper.

        This seems like a rather broad statement. Are there really zero cases where a privatized service got cheaper? Do you disagree with the example of NASA’s CRS and CCP programs in my previous comment?

        but unfortunately, they’ve also spent 1.9billion on a moon lander, with nothing to show

        I think stating that they have nothing to show is slightly disingenuous. They’ve done multiple successful suborbital hops with upper stage prototypes, and two (partially successful) launches of the full stack. I’m eagerly awaiting IFT-3, which could happen as early as March.