• TheMurphy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    107
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    This would actually be a big step for many Android users wanting to try out another OS.

    I know for myself that sideloading apps is a must for me on my phone, and if an iPhone could do that, it’s at least one step closer for consideration.

          • @BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            26 months ago

            You can sync photos with tools like Syncthing, but it’s not automatic because of how iOS stores photos.

          • @abhibeckert@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -4
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            You kind of are forced to use it app store aside.

            In the EU at least, that restriction will be gone in a couple months.

            You can not use iMessage without an apple ID but you could use RCS without a Google account.

            You can use SMS without an Apple ID, and iMessage falls back gracefully to SMS. Photos will be lower quality and sending messages to international phone numbers will be expensive… but it will work and RCS support is coming to iPhone later this year which should fix both of those.

            Another bigger drawback to not using an Apple ID is backing up is going to be an absolute pain.

            Not really. You just plug it into a PC with a USB cable, and it automatically does a backup. You could just do that every night to charge your phone.

            Because you can’t access the file system on iOS, for things like photos and contacts or messages, your only options would be iCloud as far as I know (I could be wrong) or I guess if you have a Macbook as well Airdrop?

            Yeah you’re wrong. The “Files” app on iOS, which is also embedded in various apps as a file open/save/import/export/share/etc option, has a plugin architecture where third party apps can provide all the same file storage as iCloud. You can use Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Bit Torrent Sync, an Git server, etc, etc by simply installing a third party apps.

            In fact, Apple charges monthly fee to use iCloud in the files app (assuming you want to store a reasonable amount of data in the cloud). As far as I know, most iPhone users don’t pay and a lot of those people would be using third party file apps.

            Access to photos/contacts/calendar/etc is also fully available via an API, though I’d encourage you not to let apps access that data. There’s quite a long history of it being used for some really creepy levels of tracking — for example, most photos have metadata including date/time/location and face recognition is trivial these days. You’re handing over a detailed location history for both yourself and anyone you’ve ever photographed by giving access to your data, and third party apps have been caught using this for malicious purposes. Sometimes unwittingly, as part of a third party library. Obviously it depends on the app - if you want Flickr to be your cloud storage/backup for your photo library, that’s probably safe (and Flickr does have that feature).

            Connecting an iPhone to an Apple ID is entirely optional. The only requirement is a quick check on first run wether or not the device has been reported as stolen. The App Store is the only essential functionality that requires an account with Apple even that is technically optional (you can sideload enterprise/school/work related apps for example as well as if you’re a developer you can sideload your own apps, and you can do all of that without an Apple ID on the device (the developer/enterprise/school/etc will need an account).

            • Aatube
              link
              fedilink
              56 months ago

              Yeah you’re wrong. The “Files” app on iOS, which is also embedded in various apps as a file open/save/import/export/share/etc option, has a plugin architecture where third party apps can provide all the same file storage as iCloud

              Photos, contacts, messages etc aren’t exposed to Files. The person you’ve replied to seems to be talking about cloud-syncing them with a third-party service or backing them up in a computer-decryptable way.

              you can sideload enterprise/school/work related apps

              But any other personal app will not be downloadable unless you plan to only use 3 that aren’t already installed.

        • @BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          For most functionality on Android, you also need to be signed in with Google

          Really? Funny, my Lineage devices have zero Google Crap and they work just fine. Phone, email, SMS, messengers (Telegram, XMPP, Wire, SimpleX, Signal), web works fine, I’m able to run my sync tools like Foldersync, Syncthing, Resilio, my calendar works, my shopping list app works and syncs to their servers just fine, I use 4 mapping apps two are offroad/hiking, same ones I used when it had google) my address book works, etc.

          I have ~300 apps on my phone.

          So what’s this “most functionality” thing that I apparently don’t know about?

    • @smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      116 months ago

      Still having to buy completely another device to switch operating systems… Not because the system was not adapted yet, but because of software locks and purposful roadblocks.

    • @maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      This would actually be a big step for many Android users wanting to try out another OS.

      That’s the biggest benefit, competition ripples back and forth across services and improves everything. One thing gets better, so other things have to get better, so everything gets better.

      Knock-on effects are insanely good.

    • @maness300@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      06 months ago

      Nah. As an Android user, the only other OS’s I’m interested in are ones that further embrace the Linux ecosystem.

      • @Patch@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        236 months ago

        but there’s nothing in the law that states they have to let you sideload whatever you choose

        That’s pretty much exactly what the law does say.

        The gatekeeper shall allow and technically enable the installation and effective use of third-party software applications or software application stores using, or interoperating with, its operating system and allow those software applications or software application stores to be accessed by means other than the relevant core platform services of that gatekeeper.

        There’s a provision for not letting the user actively break the device, but that’s it. And it’s couched in terms like “if strictly necessary and proportionate” and “provided they are justified”, so it’s not something Apple can apply on a whim.

          • @Patch@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            146 months ago

            It doesn’t say anything about specific software. They have to allow you to use third party stores, they don’t have to allow you to download torrent apps so that you can pirate.

            Literally in the quote I posted…

            The gatekeeper shall allow and technically enable the installation and effective use of third-party software applications or software application stores

          • @abhibeckert@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            There was a time, on Android custom roms, if you had pirated apps installed, they were uninstalled automatically. I see something similar happening here.

            I’m sure Apple will do malware scans on third party apps, like they do on the Mac. But if they start uninstalling legitimate third party apps, that’s going to be treated as “no allowing third party app stores” and the maximum EU fine for that is high enough to bankrupt Apple. They won’t do it.

            • @Railcar8095@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              06 months ago

              the maximum EU fine for that is high enough to bankrupt Apple. They won’t do it.

              I don’t think Apple will remove side loaded apps at a massive scale, but let’s be real. Apple is worth more than a trillion. If the EU fines them enough to bankrupt, they will just leave the EU and not pay the fine. US would go to war with the EU before they allow such amount of money to be transferred to the EU.

              • @maynarkh@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                06 months ago

                Meta has already got fined for more than a billion at one point for breaking the GDPR, which has smaller fines than the DMA. The US did not really do anything. The US will not go to war with its biggest ally over Apple, hell, it doesn’t stop militarily supporting key regional allies over genocide.

                Also, fines are not based on market capitalization, but on global revenue. How this would bankrupt Apple is not that the EU would bite off a trillion, but that they would grab a few bil from the revenue, and that would put Apple in the red, triggering selloffs and Apple’s valuation evaporating.

      • @maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        there’s nothing in the law that states they have to let you sideload whatever you choose.

        There is, actually. And there is much more, you also will be able to publish on the App Store without using Apple’s payment services for example.

        EU lawmakers are slow, but not completely stupid.