• Vincent
    link
    fedilink
    211 months ago

    the rules for the 100% shouldn’t be made because 10% can’t self regulate.

    Unfortunately that’s hard to avoid, because those 10% will disturb lessons and take up the teacher’s attention, thereby negatively affecting the other students.

    Are the teachers supposed to do extra work to ensure no teen had a cell phone?

    It’s way easier for a teacher to take away a phone that disturbs a lesson when there are not supposed to be phones in the first place, than have to argue about exceptions and limits to the rules every time.

    I agree and sympathise with your overall philosophy, but I’m also conscious of the practical limits, unfortunately.

    • @Waluigis_Talking_Buttplug@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 months ago

      Okay but in my school, they could already just take your phone if they wanted, their class their rules, no argument needed, but in the other school I went to it was like they were expected to.dig through kids backpacks and have them empty their pockets to find their phones they didn’t even have out

      • Vincent
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        Yeah the latter definitely sounds excessive. As for “no argument needed”, I can tell you that even if no argument is needed, that doesn’t mean that students won’t go for one :P