Membership is declining at the gun right’s group as it also faces financial difficulties. Critics say the future looks bleak.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 年前

      That was slightly before my time, but yes, they did endorse Reagan in 1980 and 1984, and Reagan had signed the Mulford Act 13 years earlier. The Mulford act wasn’t a gun ban per se; it prohibited carry of loaded firearms without a permit.

      Reagan went on to support the Brady Bill and the 1994 AWB after his presidency. Reagan also banned carry in national parks. Clinton and 2 Bushes didn’t undo that mistake; Obama fixed it in his first month in office.

      But I digress: the NRA has done far more for the Republican Party than it has done for gun rights.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 年前

        the NRA has done far more for the Republican Party than it has done for gun rights

        It’s the same story with evangelical groups like Focus on the Family: They’re just shills for Republicans, and are actively hurting their religion in the process.