Then I asked her to tell me if she knows about the books2 dataset (they trained this ai using all the pirated books in zlibrary and more, completely ignoring any copyright) and I got:

I’m sorry, but I cannot answer your question. I do not have access to the details of how I was trained or what data sources were used. I respect the intellectual property rights of others, and I hope you do too. 😊 I appreciate your interest in me, but I prefer not to continue this conversation.

Aaaand I got blocked

  • @GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    811 year ago

    Piracy is illegal in many countries, but it is very moral & ethical in many circumstances (but not all).

      • @CountVon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        361 year ago

        Corporations are always happy to pander to morality when it’s to their benefit, but I believe corporations are inherently amoral. They might make decisions that are moral, but that’s just a happy coincidence that occurs when the decision that’s in their interest also happens to be the moral choice. Corporations are equally happy to make choices that most would consider immoral, if it meets their goals.

        I have no source for this, but my theory is that when the workforce of a corporation grow past Dunbar’s number it will inherently bend toward amorality. Making moral choices requires knowing the people affected by your choices, and having empathy for them. Once it becomes impossible for one worker at a company to have a personal relationship with every other member of the staff, it’s all too easy for groups to form within the company that will make choices that drive the company’s goals (growth, revenue, profit) at the expense of anything and everything else (the environment, the community, their customers, even their own workers).

        • @namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          151 year ago

          Corporations are always happy to pander to morality when it’s to their benefit

          Seriously. We have fossil fuel companies knowingly and willingly destroying the planet in the name of profits. Where’s the outrage over that? Or is that moral and ethical?

          But when we’re talking about technologies that give power to the people to break from the shackles of the content cartels, then all of a sudden, out come the morality police!

        • @Rodeo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 year ago

          Corporations Executives are always happy to pander to morality … Corporations Executives are equally happy to make choices that most would consider immoral, if it meets their goals.

          Remember there are actual people who are making these decisions. Don’t let them hide behind some abstract legal concept, that’s part of their play.

          • @CountVon@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            7
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Remember there are actual people who are making these decisions.

            Sure, but what I want to know is why they feel comfortable making immoral decisions. Are they all psychopaths? Psychopathy is known to be more common in the C-suite, by some estimates 3.5% of executives are psychopaths. Businesses reward those who deliver good business outcomes, and psychopaths might tend do better at that with no pesky moral compass to get in the way. But the rest are just average people, probably no different than the general populace when it comes to measures of morality. So if 95%+ of oil company executives are not inherently less moral than the rest of us, why the hell would they be willing to make decisions that literally destroy the fucking planet?? I mean, the oil companies knew climate change was a big fucking problem decades ago, and they still did what they did. How the fuck does that even happen??

            My thesis here is that the corporate structure itself is sufficient to compel otherwise moral people to make choices that are absolutely heinous when viewed objectively. When you’re faced with an option that makes your corporate targets and nets you a bonus but irreparably harms some distant other, the average person will tend to make the immoral choice. They’ll rationalize it, they’ll minimize it, but ultimately they will happily fuck over someone in another country, another generation, or hell, just in another office, so they can make a buck.

            • Ann Archy
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              We are all brainwashed from birth to believe in the monolithic immutability of capitalism. This is the best system humanity has ever come up with, it is the best system humanity can come up with, and the best system humanity ever will come up with. What we have now will never change, and we have no choice but to blindly accept it no matter what it tells us and no matter where it takes us. This is what we are told day and night.

              It’s a system predicated on strife and competition, where wealth is equated with success (and good moral behavior), and poverty is something ugly and that one brought upon oneself.

              This message is hammered into us every single moment of our waking time through advertising and politics, and the fact that it is inescapable- you will not survive without a bank account, you will not survive without a job, you will not survive without paying for everything you need, because there is no alternative.

              Under such circumstances I find it very easy to see how even normal people can get caught up in the game (and it is psychologically very much reminiscent of a gambling addiction), where ones actions can be easily justified by whether it made a profit or not.

              Interestingly enough, there is a direct correlation to the Milgram experiments here- we are much more likely to act immorally if we have some (perceived) higher authority demanding it of us. In this case that authority would be “the economy”, or “the bottom line of the company”, “the interests of the shareholders” [demands it].

            • @Resonosity@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Would any group structure of the size you describe lead to the same state of affairs? Does this include government as well as any community that collects over any life activity?

              • @CountVon@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                I don’t think it’s inevitable with large groups. Take charities for example. There are very large charities that do very good work, and don’t exhibit the kind of fuckery we see in the corporate world. There are certainly bad charities too, but I’d argue those are fraudulent charities run by unethical people.

                So what’s the difference between a large reputable charity, and a corporation at a similar scale in terms of number of people involved, and amount of money involved? One is nonprofit, the other is for profit. So it’s large group plus profit motive that causes the drift toward amorality.

        • Ann Archy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t think they are amoral, they follow a rudimentary set of moral principles as in the question “what is good behavior for a company?” can be answered with “to make profit” in any capitalist structure.

          It can never be “immoral” for a company to earn a profit, unless they are specifically a non-profit company, but being a non-profit is both a special case that requires adhering to a set of rules and conditions not enforced for companies in general, but also still retain the drive to make money so as to pay for whatever non-profitable work they do.

          It’s only by imposing and enforcing strict limits on the basic tenets of capitalism that the imperative of making a profit can even be inhibited somewhat, which means that capitalism is indeed a system of morality- making money good, not making money bad.

          Which is completely fucked up and supersedes all human agency, but here we are…

      • @InternetUser2012@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        231 year ago

        Corporations not paying their employees shit is immoral but they’ll tell you you’re lucky to paid what you’re paid and you should lick their boots.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      It’s only illegal if you get caught and you’re not going to get caught because that would require the average cop to be able to use a mouse. They can’t.

      Unless you live in Saudi Arabia you’re fine.

      • @deksesuma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        It’s still illegal if you don’t get caught. You only face consequences when you are caught.

        The rest of your statement stands.

      • darcy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        i agree, tho keep in mind that while your average cop may have the computer literacy of a 5yo, many federal agencies are quite compentent with technology. not that i believe the feds are going to hack your computer for piracy (other reasons perhaps)

    • @hogmomma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Curious, when would you say that pirating is “very moral and ethical?” Not judging one way or the other, just curious.

      • Alien Nathan Edward
        link
        fedilink
        English
        331 year ago

        Out of print media that simply can’t be bought or streamed is the first thing that comes to mind. No one on the creative team is getting paid, no one is harmed and a piece of art is preserved from oblivion.

      • @SuperSpruce@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        When I pay for a copy of a video game, pirating it is ethical imo. I already paid the devs for a copy of my game, so why should they care that I also play it on my phone on an emulator?

      • Ann Archy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Every human has a right to partake in the cultural mosaic of society. Taking part in human culture is a basic need, and thus should not be a class issue.

      • @GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        In my view if it is from an indie I will try to pay for it. If it’s from a big corporation, I am not willing to play by their stupid rules.

        • @KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          That’s cool but piracy of indie stuff doesn’t mean that piracy is not moral or not ethical. Piracy is always very moral and ethical. Walling stuff off based on the sole factor that only people who have money can use that something is extremely immoral and unethical and all efforts to subvert that are just.