@NightOwl@lemm.ee to World News@lemmy.ml • 1 year agoFive years after killing a journalist in cold blood, Saudi Arabia is stronger than everwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square139fedilinkarrow-up1700arrow-down120
arrow-up1680arrow-down1external-linkFive years after killing a journalist in cold blood, Saudi Arabia is stronger than everwww.theguardian.com@NightOwl@lemm.ee to World News@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square139fedilink
minus-square@tetris11@lemmy.mllinkfedilink6•1 year agoDont do that. The Guardian is a pretty good source. Yes they are alarmist at times, but they’re the last UK newspaper to lick a boot.
minus-square@Omega_Haxors@lemmy.mllinkfedilink12•1 year agoThe problem is systematic. It didn’t take long for BBC to go from respectable journalism to trans genocide.
minus-square@tetris11@lemmy.mllinkfedilink6•1 year agoThe BBC has reported the official line since time immemorial. Their director is now more pro-fascist than ever, but the Guardian is not the mouth-piece of the government as the BBC was, and have had their offices raided numerous times.
minus-square@Omega_Haxors@lemmy.mllinkfedilink0•1 year agoAlright you’ve convinced me. They don’t attack journalists who are on the side of evil.
minus-squareTWeaKlinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoEh, while they are a good publication overall, the Guardian is the definition of permitted dissent.
Dont do that. The Guardian is a pretty good source. Yes they are alarmist at times, but they’re the last UK newspaper to lick a boot.
The problem is systematic. It didn’t take long for BBC to go from respectable journalism to trans genocide.
The BBC has reported the official line since time immemorial. Their director is now more pro-fascist than ever, but the Guardian is not the mouth-piece of the government as the BBC was, and have had their offices raided numerous times.
Alright you’ve convinced me. They don’t attack journalists who are on the side of evil.
Eh, while they are a good publication overall, the Guardian is the definition of permitted dissent.